up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126045942023

Appellant / Complainant

Anuj Gandhi

VS

Respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd, Antriksh Sanskriti Welfare Association

Developer Firm

antriksh realtech pvt ltd

Disputed Amount

30,41,172

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

11 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126045942023 by Anuj Gandhi against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd, Antriksh Sanskriti Welfare Association before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 119/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium or keep existing refund orders in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the expedited execution of previous orders and the merit-based decision of pending complaints within four months.

3
Stage 212/11/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 645/2023 for further directions.

4
Stage 303/10/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of the parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a hearing on November 12, 2024.

5
Stage 403/09/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal accepted proof of service via WhatsApp for respondent no.3 and granted various parties time to file objections and replies before listing the matter for orders on 03.10.2024.

6
Stage 501/08/2024

Defect Removal

No text available.

7
Stage 603/07/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an affidavit of service regarding notice to opposite party no. 3 and scheduled the matter for hearing on August 1, 2024.

8
Stage 703/05/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 03.07.2024.

9
Stage 824/04/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file an application for condonation of delay and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 03.05.2024.

10
Stage 9Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126045942023-19-12-2024

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium or keep existing refund orders in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the expedited execution of previous orders and the merit-based decision of pending complaints within four months.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium or keep existing refund orders in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the expedited execution of previous orders and the merit-based decision of pending complaints within four months. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium or keep existing refund orders in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the expedited execution of previous orders and the merit-based decision of pending complaints within four months.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Tushar Bahadur

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amish Dabas
  • Shobhit Mohan Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126045942023-19-12-2024

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium or keep existing refund orders in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the expedited execution of previous orders and the merit-based decision of pending complaints within four months.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for antriksh realtech pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →