up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126041432023

Appellant / Complainant

Mukesh Kumar Biyani

VS

Respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd, Antriksh Sanskriti Welfare Association

Developer Firm

antriksh realtech pvt ltd

Disputed Amount

30,41,172

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126041432023 by Mukesh Kumar Biyani against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd, Antriksh Sanskriti Welfare Association before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 119/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Authority to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

3
Stage 212/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 645/2023 regarding the orders for this matter.

4
Stage 303/10/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 12.11.2024 following a joint request from both parties.

5
Stage 403/09/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted extensions of time for the filing of replies and objections by the parties and ruled that service on respondent no. 3 was sufficient based on WhatsApp communication.

6
Stage 501/08/2024

Defect Removal

No text available.

7
Stage 630/05/2024

Defect Removal

This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated 30.05.2024 in Appeal No. D 645/2023 for the relevant directions.

8
Stage 710/05/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline set for the applicant's reply and document uploading.

9
Stage 815/04/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for further orders or hearing on 10.05.2024.

10
Stage 911/03/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. 645/2023 for the relevant orders.

11
Stage 1008/02/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal allowed an application to amend the address of respondent no.3 and directed the issuance of fresh notice, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 11.03.2024.

12
Stage 1109/11/2023

Defect Removal

No text available.

13
Stage 1226/09/2023

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural steps for service of appeal documents and the filing of objections/replies before the next hearing on 09.11.2023.

14
Stage 13Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126041432023-19-12-2024

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Authority to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Authority to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Authority to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Tushar Bahadur

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amish Dabas
  • Shobhit Mohan Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126041432023-19-12-2024

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Authority to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for antriksh realtech pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →