Appellant / Complainant
Ajay Kumar, Snehlata Kumar
Respondent
Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd
antriksh realtech pvt ltd
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126043932021 by Ajay Kumar, Snehlata Kumar against Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after determining that execution proceedings were improper; instead, the appellant was granted liberty to file a fresh complaint before the Authority for refund and interest.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter due to lack of time and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 22.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant due to counsel's unavailability and scheduled the matter for final hearing on 30.09.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and scheduled the matter for final hearing on 29.08.2024, granting the appellant a last opportunity to argue.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his unavailability and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 26.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on April 30, 2024, due to lack of time during the current session.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulties and directed both parties to comply with a previous order dated 29.03.2023 before the next hearing on 03.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and scheduled it for further proceedings on 29.02.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 24.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to serve objections via email and file hard copies with the Registry, while allowing the appellant ten days to reply upon receipt.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent 48 hours to file objections and directed the appellant to reply within one week, scheduling the next hearing for March 29, 2023.
Hearing
This text represents the header information of an appeal (APPEAL-734/2021) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Dr. Ajay Kumar and Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd; no substantive ruling or directive is contained in this excerpt.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the delay condonation application regarding a 32-day delay and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. The respondent is further directed to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal noted the appellant's incorporation of an amendment and scheduled the matter for 29.09.2022 to address the pending delay condonation application.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's amendment application to delete a reference to a specific RERA order dated 18.06.2019 and directed the applicant to incorporate this amendment within three days.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file objections to the appellant's amendment application and scheduled the matter for August 23, 2022, to dispose of said application.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an amendment application to delete one of the challenged orders and granted liberty to file a fresh appeal regarding that order.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to the appellant to take appropriate steps regarding a previous order and listed the defective appeal for further orders on 02.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted a procedural irregularity where the appellant challenged two separate orders via a single appeal and directed both counsels to present legal arguments on whether such a consolidated appeal is permissible.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the applicant to complete necessary steps for issuing notice to the respondent as per the previous order dated 15.11.2021 and listed the matter for 10.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the defective appeal for further hearing on 06.12.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126043932021-22-10-2024
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after determining that execution proceedings were improper; instead, the appellant was granted liberty to file a fresh complaint before the Authority for refund and interest.
Tribunal Order #0901126043932021-29-09-2022
The Tribunal allowed the delay condonation application regarding a 32-day delay and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. The respondent is further directed to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.
Tribunal Order #0901126043932021-23-08-2022
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's amendment application to delete a reference to a specific RERA order dated 18.06.2019 and directed the applicant to incorporate this amendment within three days.
Tribunal Order #0901126043932021-10-01-2022
The Tribunal noted a procedural irregularity where the appellant challenged two separate orders via a single appeal and directed both counsels to present legal arguments on whether such a consolidated appeal is permissible.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after determining that execution proceedings were improper; instead, the appellant was granted liberty to file a fresh complaint before the Authority for refund and interest. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after determining that execution proceedings were improper; instead, the appellant was granted liberty to file a fresh complaint before the Authority for refund and interest.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Mohd. Khalid
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
- Aahuti Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after determining that execution proceedings were improper; instead, the appellant was granted liberty to file a fresh complaint before the Authority for refund and interest.
The Tribunal allowed the delay condonation application regarding a 32-day delay and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. The respondent is further directed to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.
The Tribunal allowed the applicant's amendment application to delete a reference to a specific RERA order dated 18.06.2019 and directed the applicant to incorporate this amendment within three days.
The Tribunal noted a procedural irregularity where the appellant challenged two separate orders via a single appeal and directed both counsels to present legal arguments on whether such a consolidated appeal is permissible.
Need to research all rulings for antriksh realtech pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.