up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126012512024

Appellant / Complainant

Ajay Thapliyal

VS

Respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd, Antriksh Sanskriti Welfare Association

Developer Firm

antriksh realtech pvt ltd

Disputed Amount

30,41,172

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

12 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126012512024 by Ajay Thapliyal against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Antriksh Realtech Pvt Ltd, Antriksh Sanskriti Welfare Association before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 119/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. The Authority is directed to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

3
Stage 212/11/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 645/2023 for the relevant directions.

4
Stage 303/10/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on November 12, 2024.

5
Stage 403/09/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal accepted service of notice on respondent no.3 via WhatsApp/email and granted various respondents time to file objections, scheduling the case for orders on 03.10.2024.

6
Stage 501/08/2024

Defect Removal

No text available.

7
Stage 604/07/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for additional time to file an affidavit of service for respondent no. 3 and adjourned the matter to August 1, 2024.

8
Stage 714/05/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 04.07.2024.

9
Stage 803/05/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel three days to file an application for condonation of delay and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 14.05.2024.

10
Stage 924/04/2024

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application for condonation of delay and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on May 3, 2024.

11
Stage 10Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126012512024-19-12-2024

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. The Authority is directed to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. The Authority is directed to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. The Authority is directed to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Tushar Bahadur

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amish Dabas

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126012512024-19-12-2024

The Tribunal declared paragraph 18 of the impugned Rehabilitation Scheme ultra vires of the RERA Act, ruling that the Regulatory Authority lacks the power to impose a moratorium on existing refund orders or keep them in abeyance under Section 8. The Authority is directed to expeditiously execute previous judgments and decide pending complaints within four months.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for antriksh realtech pvt ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →