Appellant / Complainant
Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited
Respondent
Raman Guglani
gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126064972022 by Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited against Raman Guglani before up_rera.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 39-day delay and consequently dismissed the appeal due to an unsatisfactory explanation regarding data retrieval issues.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 22.10.2024 for orders, following a request from the learned counsel for the parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on September 30, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal illness and rescheduled the hearing for September 6, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for July 5, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the counsels for both parties were out of station and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on May 8, 2024, specifically to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections, failing which the opportunity to file will be closed, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 05.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's filing of objections and directed the applicant to file a reply within 10 days, scheduling the matter for consideration of condonation of delay on 01.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work and rescheduled the hearing for 26.10.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for an adjournment and directed them to file a reply to the respondent's objections regarding the grounds of appeal and condonation of delay within one week.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal accepted the appellant's submission regarding TDS compliance and issued a notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduling the matter for hearing on 10.05.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the appellant's submission regarding the deposit of a bank draft for the TDS amount and directed the counsel to rectify technical issues with the application visibility on the portal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and scheduled the matter for orders on 28.03.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 by depositing the remaining amount, warning that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the defective appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the outstanding TDS amount of Rs. 13,212/- within one week to ensure full compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126064972022-01-03-2023
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 by depositing the remaining amount, warning that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the defective appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126064972022-06-02-2023
The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the outstanding TDS amount of Rs. 13,212/- within one week to ensure full compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126064972022-22-10-2024
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 39-day delay and consequently dismissed the appeal due to an unsatisfactory explanation regarding data retrieval issues.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 39-day delay and consequently dismissed the appeal due to an unsatisfactory explanation regarding data retrieval issues. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 39-day delay and consequently dismissed the appeal due to an unsatisfactory explanation regarding data retrieval issues.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Samrat Vaish
- Mohit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act 2016 by depositing the remaining amount, warning that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the defective appeal.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the outstanding TDS amount of Rs. 13,212/- within one week to ensure full compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 39-day delay and consequently dismissed the appeal due to an unsatisfactory explanation regarding data retrieval issues.
Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.