Appellant / Complainant
Dheeraj Kumar
Respondent
Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited
gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited
₹16,01,402
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126042452021 by Dheeraj Kumar against Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to award Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in a brochure regarding a skywalk, while rejecting claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal and allowed the parties to advance submissions on merits, subsequently reserving judgment.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 27.07.2022 for consideration of the condonation of delay application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application to recall a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed due to belated adjournment notice, while allowing the respondent's late objections to be taken on record.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant and rescheduled the application for recall of the order dated 20.04.2022 to 18.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 24 hours to upload a reply to the respondent's application for recall of order and scheduled the matter for further hearing on 06.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 5000/- on the respondent for failing to inform the applicant in a timely manner and scheduled the matter for consideration of the recall application on 04.05.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the respondent for a late adjournment request and closed the opportunity to file objections due to non-compliance with previous timelines, ordering the matter to be heard based on available records.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on March 31, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove registry defects within a week and ordered that notice be issued to the respondent, with the next hearing scheduled for 25.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126042452021-27-09-2022
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to award Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in a brochure regarding a skywalk, while rejecting claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
Tribunal Order #0901126042452021-18-05-2022
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application to recall a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed due to belated adjournment notice, while allowing the respondent's late objections to be taken on record.
Tribunal Order #0901126042452021-31-03-2022
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the respondent for a late adjournment request and closed the opportunity to file objections due to non-compliance with previous timelines, ordering the matter to be heard based on available records.
Tribunal Order #0901126042452021-27-07-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal and allowed the parties to advance submissions on merits, subsequently reserving judgment.
Tribunal Order #0901126042452021-21-04-2022
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 5000/- on the respondent for failing to inform the applicant in a timely manner and scheduled the matter for consideration of the recall application on 04.05.2022.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to award Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in a brochure regarding a skywalk, while rejecting claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to award Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in a brochure regarding a skywalk, while rejecting claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Applicant/Appellant In-Person
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Samrat Vaish
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order to award Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in a brochure regarding a skywalk, while rejecting claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application to recall a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed due to belated adjournment notice, while allowing the respondent's late objections to be taken on record.
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the respondent for a late adjournment request and closed the opportunity to file objections due to non-compliance with previous timelines, ordering the matter to be heard based on available records.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal and allowed the parties to advance submissions on merits, subsequently reserving judgment.
The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs. 5000/- on the respondent for failing to inform the applicant in a timely manner and scheduled the matter for consideration of the recall application on 04.05.2022.
Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.