Appellant / Complainant
Savita, Gaurav Kumar
Respondent
Ar Landcraft Llp
ar landcraft llp
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126064032022 by Savita, Gaurav Kumar against Ar Landcraft Llp before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-811/2022) for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear despite being served notice.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and directed the Registry to comply with a previous order to notify the appellant to engage new counsel following the withdrawal of their previous counsel's Vakalatnama.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on May 6, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel has no instructions, directed the registry to issue notice to the appellant to engage new counsel, and scheduled the next hearing for 10.04.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 10.03.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders on 13.01.2025.
Delay condonation
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a new hearing on 06.12.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders on 05.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled a hearing for 25.09.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay regarding the defective appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsels of both parties to adjourn the appeal and rescheduled the hearing for 27.08.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on July 29, 2024, regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 30.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay on 28.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for February 21, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 10.07.2023 for orders, noting that the counsel for the appellant is on sanctioned leave.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 28.04.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the respondent's undertaking to file a vakalatnama and objections to the condonation of delay application within 10 days, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 08.02.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the applicant 24 hours to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the case for orders on January 4, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 02.01.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126064032022-07-07-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-811/2022) for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear despite being served notice.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-811/2022) for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear despite being served notice. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-811/2022) for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear despite being served notice.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- N A
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Azhar Ikram
- Manish Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the defective appeal (Appeal-811/2022) for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear despite being served notice.
Need to research all rulings for ar landcraft llp?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.