up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126060642022

Appellant / Complainant

Melrose Avenue Apartment Allottees Association

VS

Respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Samiah International Builders Limited, Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Developer Firm

samiah international builders limited

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility DisputesNon-Compliance & Execution

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126060642022 by Melrose Avenue Apartment Allottees Association against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Samiah International Builders Limited, Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferPromotional MisrepresentationMaintenance & Utility DisputesNon-Compliance & Execution
2
Stage 121/08/2023

Further Hearing

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's impugned order dated 11.08.2022, ruling that an executing authority cannot modify or review the original decree and must execute it as written. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority to execute the original order dated 11.06.2019 (as rectified on 05.10.2020) in its entirety.

3
Stage 218/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the counsels of both parties to list the appeal for a hearing on Monday, August 21, 2023.

4
Stage 310/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his absence and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 18.08.2023.

5
Stage 430/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 10.08.2023.

6
Stage 519/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his mother's illness and rescheduled the hearing for 30.05.2023.

7
Stage 623/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply against the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 19.04.2022.

8
Stage 715/02/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel's illness and provided 10 days for the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections, scheduling the next hearing for 23.03.2023.

9
Stage 813/01/2023

For Order

No text available.

10
Stage 916/12/2022

For Order

The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to Respondent No. 1 is sufficient and granted Respondents 1 and 2 ten days to file objections to the appeal, with a subsequent timeline for the appellant's reply.

11
Stage 1022/11/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to issue fresh notice to respondent no. 1 due to failed service and directed all parties to file objections and replies before the next hearing on 16.12.2022.

12
Stage 1117/10/2022

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an appeal challenging a Regulatory Authority order passed under Section 63 and scheduled the matter for hearing on 22.11.2022.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126060642022-21-08-2023

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's impugned order dated 11.08.2022, ruling that an executing authority cannot modify or review the original decree and must execute it as written. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority to execute the original order dated 11.06.2019 (as rectified on 05.10.2020) in its entirety.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126060642022-16-12-2022

The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to Respondent No. 1 is sufficient and granted Respondents 1 and 2 ten days to file objections to the appeal, with a subsequent timeline for the appellant's reply.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's impugned order dated 11.08.2022, ruling that an executing authority cannot modify or review the original decree and must execute it as written. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority to execute the original order dated 11.06.2019 (as rectified on 05.10.2020) in its entirety. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's impugned order dated 11.08.2022, ruling that an executing authority cannot modify or review the original decree and must execute it as written. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority to execute the original order dated 11.06.2019 (as rectified on 05.10.2020) in its entirety.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from 31.12.2011 to till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 12Section 11(4)(d)Section 19(6)Section 40Section 63Section 64

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey
  • Saurabh Misra
  • Krishna Kumar Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126060642022-21-08-2023

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's impugned order dated 11.08.2022, ruling that an executing authority cannot modify or review the original decree and must execute it as written. The matter is remanded to the Regulatory Authority to execute the original order dated 11.06.2019 (as rectified on 05.10.2020) in its entirety.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126060642022-16-12-2022

The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to Respondent No. 1 is sufficient and granted Respondents 1 and 2 ten days to file objections to the appeal, with a subsequent timeline for the appellant's reply.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for samiah international builders limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →