Appellant / Complainant
Urvashi Gupta
Respondent
Solaris Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dpl Builders Pvt. Ltd. Solaris Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
solaris realtech pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126053432022 by Urvashi Gupta against Solaris Realtech Pvt. Ltd., Dpl Builders Pvt. Ltd. Solaris Realtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and rendered infructuous following an amicable settlement reached between the appellant and the respondent.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request to adjourn the matter to 09.04.2026 to allow the parties to pursue an amicable settlement outside of court.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request to list the case for orders on 19.03.2026.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.02.2026.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that settlement talks between the parties have failed and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 28.01.2026.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the appeal for orders to 18.12.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 28.11.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that settlement processes are ongoing and adjourned the matter to 05.09.2025 for orders or hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a joint request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter, rescheduling the appeal for orders/hearing on 22.08.2025.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal for orders/hearing to 04.08.2025.
Hearing
The appeal has been adjourned to 10.07.2025 for orders, following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for May 16, 2025.
Hearing
At the request of the respondent's counsel, the tribunal has scheduled the appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 22.04.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the case for orders/hearing on 24.03.2025, following a request by the appellant to align the date with similar appeals.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to him being out of station and rescheduled the case for orders on 28.02.2025.
Hearing
The court granted a request from both counsels to reschedule the hearing, ordering the appeal to be listed for hearing on 05.02.2025.
Hearing
The proceedings were adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel, and the matter is scheduled for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 21.01.2025.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed for hearing on 28.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 16.09.2024 for orders/hearing, following a joint request from the counsels for both parties, to be heard alongside connected Appeal No. D778 of 2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the filing of the appellant's reply to supplementary objections and adjourned the matter to 13.08.2024 to be heard alongside a connected appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both the appellant's counsel and the respondent, subsequently listing the defective appeal for orders on 29.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the counsel for the applicant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's supplementary objection and scheduled the matter for April 30, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on 28.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and a hearing on 21.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the defective appeal on 11.10.2023 for the consideration of a condonation of delay application and hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the illness of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for September 20, 2023, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.08.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice on Respondent No. 2 is sufficient based on postal track reports and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections against the delay condonation application and the appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to the counsel's illness and scheduled the matter for orders on 26.04.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed an application to amend the address of respondent no. 2 and directed the appellant to serve notice and case documents via speed post and email, scheduling the next hearing for March 16, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal deemed service upon the respondent sufficient despite their non-appearance and granted them 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, warning that the matter may proceed ex parte if they fail to comply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the matter for orders on January 3, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 22.12.2022, while outlining the procedural steps for service of notice and exchange of objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126053432022-03-01-2023
The Tribunal deemed service upon the respondent sufficient despite their non-appearance and granted them 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, warning that the matter may proceed ex parte if they fail to comply.
Tribunal Order #0901126053432022-26-04-2023
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice on Respondent No. 2 is sufficient based on postal track reports and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections against the delay condonation application and the appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as withdrawn Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as withdrawn
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Mandeep Singh
- Rohit Jaiswal
- Jayant Gupta
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal deemed service upon the respondent sufficient despite their non-appearance and granted them 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, warning that the matter may proceed ex parte if they fail to comply.
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice on Respondent No. 2 is sufficient based on postal track reports and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections against the delay condonation application and the appeal.
Need to research all rulings for solaris realtech pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.