Appellant / Complainant
Glg Chit Fund Pvt Limited
Respondent
Solaris Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
solaris realtech pvt. ltd.
₹24,01,875
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126010562023 by Glg Chit Fund Pvt Limited against Solaris Realtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the respondent is liable to refund the remaining balance of Rs. 24,01,875/- plus interest, as the cash deposits made to the erstwhile developer were duly acknowledged in subsequent business transfer agreements and the respondent's own previous legal filings.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 19.11.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to the unavailability of their senior counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 15.10.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel additional time to prepare their brief and rescheduled the appeal hearing for September 11, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and directed that the defective appeal be listed on 07.08.2024 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for the defective appeal to 08.07.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 08.05.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 05.04.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on March 1, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the matter for 17.10.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for a stay of recovery proceedings due to lack of legal provision and failed maintainability arguments, while granting a one-week extension for filing objections subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections against the grounds of appeal and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the appellant's counsel.
Admission
The Tribunal disposed of the application for condonation of delay, finding the appeal was filed within limitation, and issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's grievance over a refund amount discrepancy.
Tribunal Order #0901126010562023-19-11-2024
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the respondent is liable to refund the remaining balance of Rs. 24,01,875/- plus interest, as the cash deposits made to the erstwhile developer were duly acknowledged in subsequent business transfer agreements and the respondent's own previous legal filings.
Tribunal Order #0901126010562023-19-07-2023
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for a stay of recovery proceedings due to lack of legal provision and failed maintainability arguments, while granting a one-week extension for filing objections subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-.
Tribunal Order #0901126010562023-24-03-2023
The Tribunal disposed of the application for condonation of delay, finding the appeal was filed within limitation, and issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's grievance over a refund amount discrepancy.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the respondent is liable to refund the remaining balance of Rs. 24,01,875/- plus interest, as the cash deposits made to the erstwhile developer were duly acknowledged in subsequent business transfer agreements and the respondent's own previous legal filings. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the respondent is liable to refund the remaining balance of Rs. 24,01,875/- plus interest, as the cash deposits made to the erstwhile developer were duly acknowledged in subsequent business transfer agreements and the respondent's own previous legal filings.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Divyam Krishna
- N A
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Mandeep Singh
- Rohit Jaiswal
- Jayant Gupta
- Anjali Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the respondent is liable to refund the remaining balance of Rs. 24,01,875/- plus interest, as the cash deposits made to the erstwhile developer were duly acknowledged in subsequent business transfer agreements and the respondent's own previous legal filings.
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for a stay of recovery proceedings due to lack of legal provision and failed maintainability arguments, while granting a one-week extension for filing objections subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-.
The Tribunal disposed of the application for condonation of delay, finding the appeal was filed within limitation, and issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's grievance over a refund amount discrepancy.
Need to research all rulings for solaris realtech pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.