up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126049192021

Appellant / Complainant

Prerna Singh

VS

Respondent

Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited

Developer Firm

aims max gardenia developers private limited

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126049192021 by Prerna Singh against Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited before up_rera.

2
Stage 121/12/2022

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant.

3
Stage 228/11/2022

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 319/10/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's counsel's request to withdraw his Vakalatnama and granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections, scheduling the next hearing for 28.11.2022.

5
Stage 420/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 19.10.2022.

6
Stage 523/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed for a hearing on 20.09.2022 and referred to a previous order dated 23.08.2022 passed in a related appeal.

7
Stage 602/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed for a hearing on 23.08.2022, referencing a previous order passed in a related matter.

8
Stage 708/07/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

9
Stage 818/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant's reply.

10
Stage 925/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for the appellant's reply and a hearing scheduled for 18.05.2022.

11
Stage 1028/03/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted service of notice upon the respondent and directed them to file objections to the limitation application within 10 days, scheduling the matter for April 25, 2022.

12
Stage 1104/03/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to serve notice to the respondent via dasti summons and directed the parties to exchange pleadings regarding the application for condonation of delay before the next hearing on 28.03.2022.

13
Stage 1221/01/2022

Defect Removal

No text available.

14
Stage 1324/12/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the matter for 21.01.2022 to dispose of the limitation application.

15
Stage 1422/12/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the applicant two days to remove procedural defects in the appeal and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 24.12.2021.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126049192021-08-07-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

Dismissed

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Nitesh Anan

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Suchita Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126049192021-08-07-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for aims max gardenia developers private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →