Appellant / Complainant
Sombir Kumar Chauhan
Respondent
Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited
aims max gardenia developers private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126049182021 by Sombir Kumar Chauhan against Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Sombir Kumar Chauhan due to the appellant's failure to appear or request an adjournment despite receiving notice.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to issue notice to the appellant via email and registered post regarding their counsel's application to withdraw vakalatnama, instructing them to engage new counsel or appear in person.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for a hearing on October 28, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the appellant's counsel's application to withdraw their vakalatnama and scheduled the appeal for further orders or hearing on 23.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal engagement and rescheduled the hearing for 28.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on personal grounds and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 22.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to examine objections regarding delay interest and relief sought, adjourning the matter to 22.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his father's illness and rescheduled the hearing for 23.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-962/2021 to 19.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 16.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.10.2023.
Hearing
The court granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 17.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent's counsel to prepare a response and scheduled the next hearing for April 17, 2023.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 19.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal difficulty and directed the respondent to refile their objections in the correct folder within three days.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the respondent to file objections in the remaining connected appeals within one week.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for July 8, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline set for the appellant's reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the service of notice upon the respondent and directed the respondent to file objections to the limitation application within 10 days, scheduling the next hearing for April 25, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted permission for the applicant to serve notice to the respondent via dasti summons and directed the parties to file objections and replies regarding the application for condonation of delay before the next hearing on 28.03.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the matter for 21.01.2022 to address the limitation application.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant two days to remove procedural defects identified by the Registry and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 24.12.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126049182021-08-01-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Sombir Kumar Chauhan due to the appellant's failure to appear or request an adjournment despite receiving notice.
Tribunal Order #0901126049182021-08-07-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Sombir Kumar Chauhan due to the appellant's failure to appear or request an adjournment despite receiving notice. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Sombir Kumar Chauhan due to the appellant's failure to appear or request an adjournment despite receiving notice.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nitesh Anan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Sombir Kumar Chauhan due to the appellant's failure to appear or request an adjournment despite receiving notice.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for aims max gardenia developers private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.