Appellant / Complainant
Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited
Respondent
Sanjeev Kumar Gupta
gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126043672022 by Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited against Sanjeev Kumar Gupta before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 79-day delay due to insufficient explanation and subsequently dismissed the appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a request from the counsels to list this appeal for hearing on 22.10.2024 to coincide with similar connected matters.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a better affidavit regarding their delay condonation application and scheduled the next hearing for September 27, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a better affidavit in support of their delay condonation application and scheduled the case for orders on 27.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon joint request of the counsels, rescheduled the hearing for the defective appeal to 30.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 02.07.2024 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that no one was present for the applicant and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 02.05.2024 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a subsequent hearing on 03.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on February 28, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and adjourned the matter to 25.07.2023 for hearing.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for May 8, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal found that the applicant complied with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the required interest and subsequently issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear and comply with previous directions regarding Section 43(5) of the Act.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension to the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, warning that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the proceeding.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to comply with the previous order dated 10.10.2022 and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 01.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify a defect regarding Section 43(5) compliance by ensuring the deposit amount aligns with the original impugned order rather than the Chartered Accountant's interpretation.
Tribunal Order #0901126043672022-16-02-2023
The Tribunal found that the applicant complied with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the required interest and subsequently issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126043672022-10-11-2022
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear and comply with previous directions regarding Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126043672022-01-11-2022
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension to the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, warning that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the proceeding.
Tribunal Order #0901126043672022-10-10-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify a defect regarding Section 43(5) compliance by ensuring the deposit amount aligns with the original impugned order rather than the Chartered Accountant's interpretation.
Tribunal Order #0901126043672022-22-10-2024
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 79-day delay due to insufficient explanation and subsequently dismissed the appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear and comply with previous directions regarding Section 43(5) of the Act. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 79-day delay due to insufficient explanation and subsequently dismissed the appeal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear and comply with previous directions regarding Section 43(5) of the Act. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 79-day delay due to insufficient explanation and subsequently dismissed the appeal.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Samrat Vaish
- Mohit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal found that the applicant complied with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the required interest and subsequently issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear and comply with previous directions regarding Section 43(5) of the Act.
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension to the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, warning that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the proceeding.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify a defect regarding Section 43(5) compliance by ensuring the deposit amount aligns with the original impugned order rather than the Chartered Accountant's interpretation.
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 79-day delay due to insufficient explanation and subsequently dismissed the appeal.
Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.