Appellant / Complainant
Jyoti Taneja
Respondent
Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited
gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited
₹16,01,402
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126042462021 by Jyoti Taneja against Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order that awarded Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in the brochure but rejected claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal found no defects in the appeal and directed the Registry to convert it into a Regular Appeal; the judgment has been reserved.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for July 27, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and recorded the payment of costs totaling Rs. 2,000 by the respondent's counsel.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal recalled the order dated 31.03.2022 to allow the respondent to file objections, imposing a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be split between the applicant and the legal library.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal scheduled the matter for 04.05.2022 to consider a respondent's application for the recall of an order dated 31.03.2022 which had closed the opportunity to file objections.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal due to non-compliance with previous timelines, directing that the matter be heard based on available records while allowing oral arguments.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on March 31, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove registry defects within a week and ordered that notice be issued to the respondent for the next hearing on 25.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126042462021-27-09-2022
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order that awarded Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in the brochure but rejected claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
Tribunal Order #0901126042462021-27-07-2022
The Tribunal found no defects in the appeal and directed the Registry to convert it into a Regular Appeal; the judgment has been reserved.
Tribunal Order #0901126042462021-04-05-2022
The Tribunal recalled the order dated 31.03.2022 to allow the respondent to file objections, imposing a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be split between the applicant and the legal library.
Tribunal Order #0901126042462021-18-05-2022
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and recorded the payment of costs totaling Rs. 2,000 by the respondent's counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126042462021-31-03-2022
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal due to non-compliance with previous timelines, directing that the matter be heard based on available records while allowing oral arguments.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order that awarded Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in the brochure but rejected claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order that awarded Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in the brochure but rejected claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Applicant/Appellant In-Person
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Samrat Vaish
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by Dheeraj Kumar and Jyoti Taneja, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's order that awarded Rs. 50,000 compensation for false information in the brochure but rejected claims for higher damages due to lack of documentary evidence.
The Tribunal found no defects in the appeal and directed the Registry to convert it into a Regular Appeal; the judgment has been reserved.
The Tribunal recalled the order dated 31.03.2022 to allow the respondent to file objections, imposing a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be split between the applicant and the legal library.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and recorded the payment of costs totaling Rs. 2,000 by the respondent's counsel.
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal due to non-compliance with previous timelines, directing that the matter be heard based on available records while allowing oral arguments.
Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.