Appellant / Complainant
Lallan Mishra
Respondent
Shinecity Infraproject Private Limited, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Lucknow
shinecity infraproject private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126042172021 by Lallan Mishra against Shinecity Infraproject Private Limited, U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Lucknow before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and the underlying complaint because the respondent's project was not registered under Section 3 of the Act of 2016, rendering the matter non-maintainable.
Notice
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and directed them to file a separate application for condonation of delay via email and the e-portal.
Notice
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email and directed the applicant to take necessary steps within a week. The case is scheduled for further orders on 04.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post, Dasti, and e-mail and scheduled the case for further orders on 29.11.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126042172021-07-03-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and the underlying complaint because the respondent's project was not registered under Section 3 of the Act of 2016, rendering the matter non-maintainable.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and the underlying complaint because the respondent's project was not registered under Section 3 of the Act of 2016, rendering the matter non-maintainable. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and the underlying complaint because the respondent's project was not registered under Section 3 of the Act of 2016, rendering the matter non-maintainable.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Krishna Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- | Versus INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITEDSHINECITY INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED Counsel for Appellant | .............Respondent |
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and the underlying complaint because the respondent's project was not registered under Section 3 of the Act of 2016, rendering the matter non-maintainable.
Need to research all rulings for shinecity infraproject private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.