up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126041192024

Appellant / Complainant

Vidya Singh

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Developer Firm

u.p. awas evam vikas parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

14 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126041192024 by Vidya Singh against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for future pronouncement.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has granted a request from the counsel of both parties to adjourn the appeal and has rescheduled the hearing for April 11, 2025, at 10:30 a.m.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

Delay condonation

This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated 08.04.2025 in a related appeal (Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad).

8
Stage 728/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has ordered that this appeal be listed before the Special Bench on 08.04.2025, to be heard alongside other appeals of a similar nature.

9
Stage 825/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 28.03.2025 due to counsels abstaining from judicial work following a U.P. Bar Council resolution.

10
Stage 904/02/2025

Delay condonation

The matter was called for hearing, but due to the absence of the appellant's counsel, the case has been adjourned and listed for orders/hearing on 25.02.2025.

11
Stage 1006/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted a technical glitch regarding the second respondent's details and directed the Registry to rectify it, while scheduling the next hearing for February 4, 2024, and allowing respondents to file objections to the delay condonation application.

12
Stage 1118/11/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and provided specific procedural instructions for the service of the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, scheduling the matter for hearing on 06.01.2025.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126041192024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey
  • Shireesh Kumar

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126041192024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for u.p. awas evam vikas parishad?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →