up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126040442024

Appellant / Complainant

Sarita Devi

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Developer Firm

u.p. awas evam vikas parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126040442024 by Sarita Devi against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The court heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for delivery.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Further Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 411/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal has ordered that arguments in the ongoing appeal be continued at a further hearing scheduled for April 21, 2025, at 1:30 p.m.

6
Stage 509/04/2025

Further Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for hearing on April 11, 2025, at 10:30 a.m.

7
Stage 608/04/2025

For Order

The Tribunal refers the matter to the orders passed in a related appeal (Appeal No. D 220/2024, Jitendra Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad) for directions.

8
Stage 728/03/2025

For Order

The Tribunal has ordered that this appeal be listed before a Special Bench on 08.04.2025 along with other appeals of a similar nature.

9
Stage 825/02/2025

For Order

The appeal is adjourned to 28.03.2025 because the counsels are abstaining from judicial work following a resolution by the U.P. Bar Council.

10
Stage 905/02/2025

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for February 25, 2025.

11
Stage 1008/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 05.02.2025 and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

12
Stage 1110/12/2024

For Order

The Tribunal granted Respondent No. 2 ten days to file objections to the appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for January 8, 2025.

13
Stage 1208/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal has issued notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for the service of appeal documents and the filing of objections.

14
Stage 13Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126040442024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126040442024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for u.p. awas evam vikas parishad?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →