up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126040422024

Appellant / Complainant

Qaiser Masroor Ansari

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Developer Firm

u.p. awas evam vikas parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

13 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126040422024 by Qaiser Masroor Ansari against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 129/08/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

3
Stage 223/04/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from various counsels representing the appellant and respondents, and subsequently reserved the judgment for delivery.

4
Stage 321/04/2025

Hearing

No text available.

5
Stage 415/04/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has ordered the matter to be listed on 21.04.2025 at 1:30 p.m. along with other similar appeals in a Special Bench.

6
Stage 518/03/2025

Hearing

The appeal is adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on 15.04.2025 due to lawyers abstaining from judicial work following a resolution by the Real Estate Bar Association, Lucknow.

7
Stage 621/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the case for a hearing on 18.03.2025 due to the absence of the respondent.

8
Stage 728/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondents 10 days to file objections and upload their vakalatnama, with the appellant permitted to file a reply within one week thereafter. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 21.02.2025.

9
Stage 808/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted respondents 10 days to file objections and their vakalatnama, with the appellant permitted to file a rejoinder within a week thereafter. The matter is listed for orders on 28.01.2025.

10
Stage 910/12/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted Respondent No. 2 ten days to file objections against the grounds of appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for 08.01.2025.

11
Stage 1008/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for the service of appeal documents and the filing of objections by the respondent.

12
Stage 11Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126040422024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from the date of allotment/agreement till the date of offer of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Shireesh Kumar

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126040422024-29-08-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for u.p. awas evam vikas parishad?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →