up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126036702021

Appellant / Complainant

Nirmala Devi

VS

Respondent

Aftek Developers Private Limited

Developer Firm

aftek developers private limited

Disputed Amount

5,74,189

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126036702021 by Nirmala Devi against Aftek Developers Private Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 130/06/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum due to failure to deliver possession by the agreed deadline.

3
Stage 227/04/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal against a RERA order that rejected a refund and penalty claim due to undisclosed prior payments and jurisdictional issues; judgment has been reserved.

4
Stage 320/04/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the parties one week to negotiate an amicable settlement involving the respondent offering an alternative unit to the appellant. The respondent must provide details of available units within three days for the appellant's inspection and decision.

5
Stage 419/04/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 24 hours to seek instructions regarding compliance with BBA provisions and the possibility of refunding the appellant's deposit with interest.

6
Stage 501/04/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 19.04.2022, noting that if the respondent fails to appear at the next hearing, the court may be constrained to summon the CMD of the respondent company.

7
Stage 610/03/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for April 1, 2022.

8
Stage 705/01/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal noted the respondent's reply to the grounds of appeal and granted the appellant the option to file a replication/rejoinder, adjourning the matter to 28.01.2022.

9
Stage 813/12/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for January 5, 2022.

10
Stage 918/11/2021

Notice

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and adjourned the matter to 13.12.2021.

11
Stage 1026/10/2021

Notice

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and reply to the appeal within ten days and scheduled the next hearing for November 18, 2021.

12
Stage 1115/09/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 26.10.2021.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126036702021-30-06-2022

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum due to failure to deliver possession by the agreed deadline.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126036702021-27-04-2022

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal against a RERA order that rejected a refund and penalty claim due to undisclosed prior payments and jurisdictional issues; judgment has been reserved.

15
Stage 14Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126036702021-20-04-2022

The Tribunal granted the parties one week to negotiate an amicable settlement involving the respondent offering an alternative unit to the appellant. The respondent must provide details of available units within three days for the appellant's inspection and decision.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126036702021-01-04-2022

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 19.04.2022, noting that if the respondent fails to appear at the next hearing, the court may be constrained to summon the CMD of the respondent company.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum due to failure to deliver possession by the agreed deadline. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum due to failure to deliver possession by the agreed deadline.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till refund of the said amount

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Rachit Sondhi

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Anurag Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126036702021-30-06-2022

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum due to failure to deliver possession by the agreed deadline.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126036702021-27-04-2022

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an appeal against a RERA order that rejected a refund and penalty claim due to undisclosed prior payments and jurisdictional issues; judgment has been reserved.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126036702021-20-04-2022

The Tribunal granted the parties one week to negotiate an amicable settlement involving the respondent offering an alternative unit to the appellant. The respondent must provide details of available units within three days for the appellant's inspection and decision.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126036702021-01-04-2022

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 19.04.2022, noting that if the respondent fails to appear at the next hearing, the court may be constrained to summon the CMD of the respondent company.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for aftek developers private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →