Appellant / Complainant
Harsha Associates Pvt Ltd
Respondent
UP RERA, Razi Ahmad, Rumana Simi
harsha associates pvt ltd
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126032402023 by Harsha Associates Pvt Ltd against UP RERA, Razi Ahmad, Rumana Simi before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 981-day delay and dismissed the appeal, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or due diligence.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 22.07.2025 and clarified that the pendency of the appeal does not stay the execution of the impugned order.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay and the defective appeal for July 1, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to being out of station and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.05.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file additional documents and a rejoinder, subsequently listing the defective appeal for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 07.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.03.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and rescheduled the appeal for orders to 13.02.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.01.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for January 10, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the next hearing for December 2, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the case for orders/hearing on 24.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant and rescheduled the hearing for September 13, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections within one week and scheduled the matter for hearing on 09.08.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal deemed service on the respondent sufficient and granted them 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal notes the appellant's partial deposit of Rs. 2,23,590/- against a penalty and issues notice to the respondent for the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for 10.04.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126032402023-22-07-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 981-day delay and dismissed the appeal, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or due diligence.
Tribunal Order #0901126032402023-07-03-2024
The Tribunal notes the appellant's partial deposit of Rs. 2,23,590/- against a penalty and issues notice to the respondent for the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for 10.04.2024.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 981-day delay and dismissed the appeal, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or due diligence. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 981-day delay and dismissed the appeal, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or due diligence.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Mahima Pahwa
- Prashant Kumar Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 981-day delay and dismissed the appeal, finding the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or due diligence.
The Tribunal notes the appellant's partial deposit of Rs. 2,23,590/- against a penalty and issues notice to the respondent for the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for 10.04.2024.
Need to research all rulings for harsha associates pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.