up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126029382021

Appellant / Complainant

Satya Prakash Sharma

VS

Respondent

Paarth Infrabuild Private Limited

Developer Firm

paarth infrabuild private limited

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Promotional Misrepresentation

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029382021 by Satya Prakash Sharma against Paarth Infrabuild Private Limited before up_rera.

Promotional Misrepresentation
2
Stage 116/05/2022

Hearing

The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing access to an existing stadium club facility until the project's club is completed.

3
Stage 204/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted a settlement between the parties and directed both parties to complete the registry of the flat and execute the conveyance/lease deed in the interim.

4
Stage 331/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date to facilitate a settlement regarding disputed dues and flat possession.

5
Stage 410/03/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 31, 2022.

6
Stage 505/01/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent's representative and directed that the respondent's counsel must appear through a Director or Authorized Representative empowered to make final decisions at the next hearing on 28.01.2022.

7
Stage 629/11/2021

Further Order

The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

8
Stage 729/10/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an objection against the limitation application within one week and scheduled the matter for 29.11.2021 to dispose of said application.

9
Stage 829/09/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.

10
Stage 907/09/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for September 29, 2021.

11
Stage 1013/08/2021

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange applications, objections, and replies via email before the next hearing on 07.09.2021.

12
Stage 11Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029382021-16-05-2022

The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing access to an existing stadium club facility until the project's club is completed.

13
Stage 12Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029382021-29-11-2021

The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029382021-29-09-2021

The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.

15
Stage 14Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029382021-04-04-2022

The Tribunal noted a settlement between the parties and directed both parties to complete the registry of the flat and execute the conveyance/lease deed in the interim.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126029382021-31-03-2022

The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date to facilitate a settlement regarding disputed dues and flat possession.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing access to an existing stadium club facility until the project's club is completed. Awarded in favor of Partial.

Disposal Winner: PartialStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing access to an existing stadium club facility until the project's club is completed.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 12

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Shailender Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Rajiv Shukla
  • Suyash Bajpai

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029382021-16-05-2022

The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days, while providing access to an existing stadium club facility until the project's club is completed.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029382021-29-11-2021

The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029382021-29-09-2021

The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029382021-04-04-2022

The Tribunal noted a settlement between the parties and directed both parties to complete the registry of the flat and execute the conveyance/lease deed in the interim.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126029382021-31-03-2022

The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date to facilitate a settlement regarding disputed dues and flat possession.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for paarth infrabuild private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →