Appellant / Complainant
Jai Prakash Pandey
Respondent
Paarth Infrabuild Pvt Ltd
paarth infrabuild pvt ltd
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029342021 by Jai Prakash Pandey against Paarth Infrabuild Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days and provided interim access to an alternative club facility.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the parties have reached a settlement and directed both parties to complete the registry of the flat and execute the conveyance/lease deed in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date to facilitate a settlement regarding disputed dues and flat possession.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 31, 2022.
Further Order
The court noted the absence of the respondent and directed that the respondent's representative or authorized person must appear at the next hearing. The case is adjourned to 28.01.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file an objection against the appellant's limitation application within one week and scheduled the matter for 29.11.2021 to dispose of said application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange replies via email before the next hearing on 29.09.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange pleadings via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 07.09.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126029342021-29-09-2021
The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126029342021-16-05-2022
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days and provided interim access to an alternative club facility.
Tribunal Order #0901126029342021-04-04-2022
The Tribunal noted that the parties have reached a settlement and directed both parties to complete the registry of the flat and execute the conveyance/lease deed in the interim.
Tribunal Order #0901126029342021-31-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date to facilitate a settlement regarding disputed dues and flat possession.
Tribunal Order #0901126029342021-29-11-2021
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days and provided interim access to an alternative club facility. Awarded in favor of Partial.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days and provided interim access to an alternative club facility.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shailender Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Rajiv Shukla
- Suyash Bajpai
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal issued a warning to the respondent's counsel for failing to file a vakalatnama and objections as promised, granting a final 10-day extension for filing objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal.
The appeal was disposed of following an out-of-court settlement where the respondent agreed to install a video door phone and intercom facility within 30 days and provided interim access to an alternative club facility.
The Tribunal noted that the parties have reached a settlement and directed both parties to complete the registry of the flat and execute the conveyance/lease deed in the interim.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to appear in person and ordered the respondent's General Manager, Sri Satish Chandra Verma, to appear personally on the next date to facilitate a settlement regarding disputed dues and flat possession.
The Tribunal allowed the limitation application, condoning a 54-day delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents, and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for paarth infrabuild pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.