Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
u.p. awas evam vikas parishad
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126029132024 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Justice Yogesh Chandra Gupta, upholding its previous decision that the Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant delay interest and that such power rests exclusively with the Regulatory Authority.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels regarding the review petition and objections, subsequently reserving the judgment for further deliberation.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to prepare the brief and adjourned the matter to 15.10.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application to condone a 14-day delay in filing review petition No. 13/2024 due to the petitioner's illness and scheduled the matter for hearing on 17.09.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the review petition (RP-13/2024) to September 9, 2025, following a request from the counsels for both parties.
For Order
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the review petition (RP-13/2024) and the filed objections, subsequently reserving the judgment for future pronouncement.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the review petitioner's request for more time to argue the matter and scheduled the case for hearing/orders on 23.04.2025.
For Order
Upon the request of the learned counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the case for a subsequent hearing on 26.03.2025.
For Order
The court has adjourned the review application (RP-13/2024) at the request of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for February 7, 2025.
For Order
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 10.01.2025 for orders/hearing following a request from the respondent's counsel.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.11.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the counsel for the review petition seven days to file a reply to the objections submitted by the opposite party and scheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 22.10.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant 10 days to file objections to the review petition and directed the respondent to file a reply within one week of receiving the soft copy. The matter is listed for orders on 12.09.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the applicant to serve copies of the review application and condonation of delay application to the respondent, with the respondent instructed to file objections upon receipt. The matter is scheduled for consideration on 09.08.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126029132024-09-01-2026
The Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Justice Yogesh Chandra Gupta, upholding its previous decision that the Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant delay interest and that such power rests exclusively with the Regulatory Authority.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Justice Yogesh Chandra Gupta, upholding its previous decision that the Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant delay interest and that such power rests exclusively with the Regulatory Authority. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Justice Yogesh Chandra Gupta, upholding its previous decision that the Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant delay interest and that such power rests exclusively with the Regulatory Authority.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- N.N. Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Siddhartha Singh
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the Review Petition filed by Justice Yogesh Chandra Gupta, upholding its previous decision that the Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant delay interest and that such power rests exclusively with the Regulatory Authority.
Need to research all rulings for u.p. awas evam vikas parishad?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.