up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126025072022

Appellant / Complainant

Amandeep Singh Khurana

VS

Respondent

Elegant Infracon Private Limited

Developer Firm

elegant infracon private limited

Disputed Amount

14,63,201

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

29 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126025072022 by Amandeep Singh Khurana against Elegant Infracon Private Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 110/02/2026

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the Respondent to refund the entire deposited amounts to both appellants with interest at MCLR + 1% from the date of deposit until payment.

3
Stage 217/11/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsels for both parties regarding the appeal and its objections, subsequently reserving the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 314/11/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to upload required documents in compliance with a previous order and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.11.2025.

5
Stage 415/10/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file documents regarding force majeure and scheduled the next hearing for November 14, 2025.

6
Stage 509/09/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file documents and adjourned the appeal to 15.10.2025.

7
Stage 628/08/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week's time to file documents regarding an NGT order and Section 8 proceedings, and scheduled the next hearing for September 9, 2025.

8
Stage 712/08/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, noting that the appeal was filed within the limitation period extended by the Supreme Court, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

9
Stage 822/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay, with a warning that failure to do so will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal.

10
Stage 921/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to the unavailability of their senior counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 22.07.2025.

11
Stage 1010/07/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal noted that the parties failed to reach an amicable settlement and adjourned the matter for final hearing on 21.07.2025.

12
Stage 1119/05/2025

Part Heard

The Tribunal noted that the parties are negotiating an amicable settlement and adjourned the appeal to 10.07.2025.

13
Stage 1212/05/2025

For Order

The Tribunal noted the respondent's proposal for an amicable settlement and adjourned the matter to 19.05.2025 to allow the appellant to seek instructions.

14
Stage 1323/04/2025

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to deposit a specified cost amount and scheduled the next hearing for May 12, 2025.

15
Stage 1402/08/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-530/2022) for want of prosecution because no one appeared to press the case and the counsel present had no instructions.

16
Stage 1522/05/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders/hearing on August 2, 2023.

17
Stage 1611/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 24 hours to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 22.05.2023.

18
Stage 1727/02/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and noted that settlement efforts are underway, scheduling the next hearing for April 11, 2023.

19
Stage 1825/01/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

20
Stage 1915/12/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsels of both parties to list the defective appeal on 25.01.2023 for further orders.

21
Stage 2018/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the Respondent a short extension to file objections against the delay condonation application and a reply to the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for December 15, 2022.

22
Stage 2119/10/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and reply to the grounds of appeal at least 10 days before the next hearing date, scheduled for 18.11.2022.

23
Stage 2215/09/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

24
Stage 2318/08/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to serve the respondent via speed post and email before the next hearing on 15.09.2022.

25
Stage 2410/08/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to rectify three identified procedural defects in the appeal, failing which the appeal will be dismissed.

26
Stage 25Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126025072022-23-04-2025

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to deposit a specified cost amount and scheduled the next hearing for May 12, 2025.

27
Stage 26Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126025072022-10-02-2026

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the Respondent to refund the entire deposited amounts to both appellants with interest at MCLR + 1% from the date of deposit until payment.

28
Stage 27Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126025072022-02-08-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-530/2022) for want of prosecution because no one appeared to press the case and the counsel present had no instructions.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the Respondent to refund the entire deposited amounts to both appellants with interest at MCLR + 1% from the date of deposit until payment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-530/2022) for want of prosecution because no one appeared to press the case and the counsel present had no instructions. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the Respondent to refund the entire deposited amounts to both appellants with interest at MCLR + 1% from the date of deposit until payment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-530/2022) for want of prosecution because no one appeared to press the case and the counsel present had no instructions.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till the date of payment

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Sourabh Gupta

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Prashant Kumar

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126025072022-23-04-2025

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to deposit a specified cost amount and scheduled the next hearing for May 12, 2025.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126025072022-10-02-2026

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the Respondent to refund the entire deposited amounts to both appellants with interest at MCLR + 1% from the date of deposit until payment.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126025072022-02-08-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal (APPEAL-530/2022) for want of prosecution because no one appeared to press the case and the counsel present had no instructions.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for elegant infracon private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →