up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126024862023

Appellant / Complainant

Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Rakesh Kumar

Developer Firm

gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

33 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126024862023 by Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited against Rakesh Kumar before up_rera.

2
Stage 117/02/2026

Delay condonation

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 72-day delay and consequently dismissed Appeal No. D437 of 2023, citing a lack of sufficient cause and administrative lethargy.

3
Stage 215/01/2026

Delay condonation

No text available.

4
Stage 314/01/2026

Delay condonation

The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment, and the tribunal subsequently rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.02.2026.

5
Stage 408/12/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 15.01.2026.

6
Stage 530/10/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 08.12.2025.

7
Stage 624/09/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has granted a request to list the case for orders on 30.10.2025.

8
Stage 719/08/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.09.2025.

9
Stage 815/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.08.2025.

10
Stage 912/05/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant promoter to restore electricity and water connections to the unit within 24 hours and file an affidavit of compliance.

11
Stage 1018/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.05.2025.

12
Stage 1120/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal listed the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 18.04.2025.

13
Stage 1217/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant/promoter to hand over the unit in habitable condition to the respondent/allottee on or before the next hearing date, noting that while the cost price is paid, possession is subject to the outcome of a pending dispute with the Competent Authority regarding OC/CC.

14
Stage 1324/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request from the learned counsel for the parties to adjourn the appeal and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 17.02.2025.

15
Stage 1403/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the respondent's payment of costs and granted an adjournment to the appellant, while explicitly warning that no further adjournments will be permitted due to a lack of cooperation.

16
Stage 1521/10/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to file a better affidavit and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on December 3, 2024.

17
Stage 1615/10/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and rescheduled the appeal to be listed on 21.10.2024 to align with similar matters.

18
Stage 1725/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an amendment application and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 15.10.2024.

19
Stage 1806/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted time to the appellant to file an amendment application to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the case for orders on 25.09.2024.

20
Stage 1906/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 06.09.2024 for hearing following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.

21
Stage 2004/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his mother's illness and rescheduled the hearing for August 6, 2024.

22
Stage 2124/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to their unavailability and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 04.07.2024.

23
Stage 2224/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and listed the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 24.05.2024.

24
Stage 2319/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for an ex-parte hearing on 24.04.2024.

25
Stage 2415/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2024.

26
Stage 2508/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 15.02.2024.

27
Stage 2629/09/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

28
Stage 2718/08/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for September 29, 2023.

29
Stage 2803/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for August 18, 2023.

30
Stage 29Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126024862023-17-02-2026

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 72-day delay and consequently dismissed Appeal No. D437 of 2023, citing a lack of sufficient cause and administrative lethargy.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126024862023-12-05-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant promoter to restore electricity and water connections to the unit within 24 hours and file an affidavit of compliance.

32
Stage 31Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126024862023-17-02-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant/promoter to hand over the unit in habitable condition to the respondent/allottee on or before the next hearing date, noting that while the cost price is paid, possession is subject to the outcome of a pending dispute with the Competent Authority regarding OC/CC.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 72-day delay and consequently dismissed Appeal No. D437 of 2023, citing a lack of sufficient cause and administrative lethargy. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 72-day delay and consequently dismissed Appeal No. D437 of 2023, citing a lack of sufficient cause and administrative lethargy.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Samrat Vaish
  • Mohit Yadav
  • Sangya Negi

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Shukla
  • Harprit Singh Arora

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126024862023-17-02-2026

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 72-day delay and consequently dismissed Appeal No. D437 of 2023, citing a lack of sufficient cause and administrative lethargy.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126024862023-12-05-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant promoter to restore electricity and water connections to the unit within 24 hours and file an affidavit of compliance.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126024862023-17-02-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant/promoter to hand over the unit in habitable condition to the respondent/allottee on or before the next hearing date, noting that while the cost price is paid, possession is subject to the outcome of a pending dispute with the Competent Authority regarding OC/CC.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →