Appellant / Complainant
Mohan Lal Sahu
Respondent
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd., Rishita Developers Pvt. Ltd
ansal properties and infrastructure ltd.
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126023632021 by Mohan Lal Sahu against Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd., Rishita Developers Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that it lacks the jurisdiction under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 to modify sanctioned layout plans, but granted the appellants liberty to seek compensation for false statements or approach the appropriate authority under Chapter VIII.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 29.01.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has rescheduled the final hearing of Appeal-335/2021 to 16.01.2025 following a joint request from both parties.
For Order
Upon a joint request from the parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled it for orders on 27.11.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a third party one week to file a reply to the appellant's objections regarding an impleadment application and scheduled the next hearing for October 3, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that objections to a third party's impleadment application have been filed and scheduled the matter for arguments on said application on 06.09.2024.
For Order
Upon a joint request from the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed for orders or hearing on 06.08.2024.
Hearing
Chairman Dr. Justice (Dr.) D.K. Arora recuses himself from hearing matters involving the respondent company, Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd., due to a potential conflict of interest, directing that all such cases be listed before another Bench.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the applicant for filing a reply to objections regarding an impleadment application and scheduled the matter for hearing on 11.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 20.09.2023 due to a request from the respondent's counsel and pending impleadment applications.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment following an application for impleadment by a new flat purchaser and scheduled the matter for orders on 27.07.2023.
Further Consideration
The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-335/2021 and has reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file relevant documents regarding land ownership of ZSE 1 and the stadium construction, including proof of approval from competent authorities and an explanation for the delay in seeking such approvals.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a formal timeline, start date, and completion schedule for all amenities, including maps, noting that their previous affidavit lacked specific timelines.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent two days to comply with a previous order dated 28.04.2022 and incorporate a missing undertaking regarding no future changes to the DPR, adjourning the matter to 12.05.2022.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon records from the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority and ordered the respondent to file an affidavit detailing amenities provided versus advertised, including a timeline for completion.
Further Order
The Tribunal proceeded to hear arguments from both parties but adjourned the matter to the following day (27.04.2022) due to lack of time.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed within time and that replies to the grounds of appeal have been filed by the respondents; the matter is adjourned to 26.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal corrected a procedural error by directing that the case be registered as a Regular Appeal instead of a defective appeal. The matter is scheduled for further orders on 02.02.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondents to file a reply to the grounds of appeal within 10 days and scheduled the defective appeal for further hearing on January 5, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the respondents to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and serve a copy to the appellant via email before the next hearing on 29.11.2021.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal allowed an application to amend a party's name due to technical software issues and directed the issuance of notice to the respondent.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry-identified defects within one week and scheduled the matter for further orders on 24.09.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126023632021-29-01-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that it lacks the jurisdiction under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 to modify sanctioned layout plans, but granted the appellants liberty to seek compensation for false statements or approach the appropriate authority under Chapter VIII.
Tribunal Order #0901126023632021-12-05-2022
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a formal timeline, start date, and completion schedule for all amenities, including maps, noting that their previous affidavit lacked specific timelines.
Tribunal Order #0901126023632021-28-04-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon records from the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority and ordered the respondent to file an affidavit detailing amenities provided versus advertised, including a timeline for completion.
Tribunal Order #0901126023632021-05-01-2022
The Tribunal corrected a procedural error by directing that the case be registered as a Regular Appeal instead of a defective appeal. The matter is scheduled for further orders on 02.02.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126023632021-19-05-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file relevant documents regarding land ownership of ZSE 1 and the stadium construction, including proof of approval from competent authorities and an explanation for the delay in seeking such approvals.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that it lacks the jurisdiction under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 to modify sanctioned layout plans, but granted the appellants liberty to seek compensation for false statements or approach the appropriate authority under Chapter VIII. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that it lacks the jurisdiction under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 to modify sanctioned layout plans, but granted the appellants liberty to seek compensation for false statements or approach the appropriate authority under Chapter VIII.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- APPLICANT/APPELLANT IN-PERSON
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vipul Agarwal
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that it lacks the jurisdiction under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 to modify sanctioned layout plans, but granted the appellants liberty to seek compensation for false statements or approach the appropriate authority under Chapter VIII.
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a formal timeline, start date, and completion schedule for all amenities, including maps, noting that their previous affidavit lacked specific timelines.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to summon records from the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority and ordered the respondent to file an affidavit detailing amenities provided versus advertised, including a timeline for completion.
The Tribunal corrected a procedural error by directing that the case be registered as a Regular Appeal instead of a defective appeal. The matter is scheduled for further orders on 02.02.2022.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file relevant documents regarding land ownership of ZSE 1 and the stadium construction, including proof of approval from competent authorities and an explanation for the delay in seeking such approvals.
Need to research all rulings for ansal properties and infrastructure ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.