Appellant / Complainant
Anupam Kumar Garg
Respondent
Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Ltd.
ansal properties and infrastructure ltd.
₹12,08,161
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001292021 by Anupam Kumar Garg against Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Ltd. before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the respondent had paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 28.09.2022 after the respondent's counsel noted that the full recovery amount has already been collected.
Hearing
The respondent submitted that the appeal has become infructuous as they have paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings; the court directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and listed the matter for further orders on 22.09.2022.
Hearing
The matter was adjourned upon the request of the appellant's counsel as no one appeared on behalf of the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that a settlement is being negotiated between the parties, with partial payment already made by the respondent, and adjourned the matter to 10.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the non-appearance of parties and rescheduled the hearing for 13.07.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal disposed of the delay condonation application and directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date on 04.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objections within one week and ordered the respondent to upload said objections to the e-portal before the next hearing on 01.04.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the respondent to upload their reply to the appeal on the e-portal and file a physical copy on record, adjourning the matter to 03.02.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 105-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed that the defective appeal be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalat Nama and directed that any objections to the limitation application be filed within one week.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file objections to the limitation application and rescheduled the matter for November 8, 2021.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their vakalatnama within a week and submit objections to the condonation of delay application along with grounds of appeal within 15 days.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notices to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed both parties to exchange documents via email and upload replies to the e-portal before the next hearing on 22.03.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001292021-08-09-2022
The respondent submitted that the appeal has become infructuous as they have paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings; the court directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and listed the matter for further orders on 22.09.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126001292021-29-11-2021
The Tribunal condoned a 105-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed that the defective appeal be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126001292021-28-09-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the respondent had paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the respondent had paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the respondent had paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shikhar Srivastava
- Abhishek Vishwakarma
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The respondent submitted that the appeal has become infructuous as they have paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings; the court directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and listed the matter for further orders on 22.09.2022.
The Tribunal condoned a 105-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and Supreme Court guidelines, and directed that the defective appeal be registered as a Regular Appeal.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the respondent had paid the full dues of Rs. 12,08,161/- following recovery proceedings.
Need to research all rulings for ansal properties and infrastructure ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.