up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126021112025

Appellant / Complainant

Sangeeta Chaurasia

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Developer Firm

u.p. awas evam vikas parishad

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

8 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126021112025 by Sangeeta Chaurasia against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 112/11/2025

Admission

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint based on the Limitation Act, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

3
Stage 216/10/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has scheduled the matter for orders on 12.11.2025 and directed the Registry to record the appearance of Sri N. N. Pandey as counsel for the respondent.

4
Stage 317/09/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the Respondent 10 days to file objections and directed that a rejoinder be filed within a week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for 16.10.2025.

5
Stage 402/09/2025

Admission

The Tribunal directed the issuance of fresh notices to the respondent and outlined the procedural timeline for service of appeal documents and filing of objections.

6
Stage 518/08/2025

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for service of notice and the exchange of objections and replies between the parties.

7
Stage 6Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126021112025-12-11-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint based on the Limitation Act, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint based on the Limitation Act, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint based on the Limitation Act, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav
  • V. P. Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126021112025-12-11-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had rejected the appellant's complaint based on the Limitation Act, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for u.p. awas evam vikas parishad?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →