Appellant / Complainant
Ajay Kumar Srivastava
Respondent
Sahara Prime City Ltd.
sahara prime city ltd.
₹30,45,900
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126017502020 by Ajay Kumar Srivastava against Sahara Prime City Ltd. before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that the records of the Regulatory Authority were never summoned; consequently, no records could be transmitted back, and the file was ordered to be consigned to the record room.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Sahara Prime City Ltd. to refund the total amount deposited by the appellants with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until actual payment.
Further Order
The court heard arguments from the appellant's counsel and reserved the judgment for further consideration.
For Order
The Tribunal directed both counsels to exchange a list of dates, events, and relied-upon cases before the next hearing, which is scheduled for 04.01.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file their Vakalat Nama and reply to the appeal, directing that a copy be emailed to the appellant before the next hearing on 29.11.2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalat Nama and a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their vakalatnama and a reply to the grounds of appeal within specified timeframes, with the case scheduled for hearing on 20.04.2021.
Ex-Parte
The appeal was adjourned due to a lawyers' strike, with the court directing the parties to exchange pleadings and rescheduling the defective appeal for 22.03.2021.
Notice
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 04.03.2021 due to the respondent's absence and issued a warning that the matter may be heard ex-parte on the next date.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal converted the defective appeal into a regular appeal and directed that notice be re-issued to the respondent via email within five days.
Tribunal Order #0901126017502020-12-10-2022
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Sahara Prime City Ltd. to refund the total amount deposited by the appellants with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until actual payment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Sahara Prime City Ltd. to refund the total amount deposited by the appellants with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until actual payment. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% p.a..
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Sahara Prime City Ltd. to refund the total amount deposited by the appellants with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until actual payment.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1% p.a.
Interest Period
from the date of deposit till the date of actual payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shailender Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Surendra Kumar Mishra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed Sahara Prime City Ltd. to refund the total amount deposited by the appellants with interest at MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until actual payment.
Need to research all rulings for sahara prime city ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.