Appellant / Complainant
Santosh Kumar Sahoo
Respondent
Sahara Prime City Ltd.
sahara prime city ltd.
₹30,00,759
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000792019 by Santosh Kumar Sahoo against Sahara Prime City Ltd. before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal as 'not pressed,' allowing them to seek execution of the original RERA order for refund and interest, while requesting RERA to expedite the process due to the family's financial hardship.
Hearing
The Tribunal revised the list and rescheduled the hearing for Appeal-5/2019 to 26.08.2022.
Hearing
The respondent's counsel requested and was granted a one-week extension to seek instructions regarding the refund of money to the appellant; the matter is listed for 03.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions regarding the refund of an amount as per the RERA order and noted the appellant's intent to amend the legal heir details.
Hearing
The court noted the substitution of the deceased appellant's legal heir and recorded the respondent's statement that they will comply with the Regulatory Authority's order; the case is listed for further orders on 13.05.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the death of both the appellant and his counsel, directing the legal heirs to appear in person at the next hearing scheduled for 09.05.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for an adjournment to seek instructions and rescheduled the hearing for April 1, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 03.02.2022 after the appellant's counsel requested time to file a Vakalatnama and noted the absence of the respondent.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 10.01.2022 to allow the wife of the deceased appellant time to engage new counsel following a substitution application.
Notice
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered that notice be issued to the appellant via registered post and email, while scheduling the next hearing for December 13, 2021.
Notice
The Tribunal noted the substitution of Mrs. Sweta Gupta following the death of the appellant and adjourned the matter to 22.11.2021 after directing that the applicant be informed via email.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the substitution of the deceased appellant's legal heirs and issued a notice to the applicant, scheduling the matter for further orders on 25.10.2021.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the respondent's intent to submit a fresh settlement proposal regarding possession and delay penalties, and directed the appellant to appear in person at the next hearing on 13.04.2021.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the case and directed the respondent to prepare and email a settlement proposal to the appellant and his counsel within 15 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126000792019-26-08-2022
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal as 'not pressed,' allowing them to seek execution of the original RERA order for refund and interest, while requesting RERA to expedite the process due to the family's financial hardship.
Tribunal Order #0901126000792019-13-05-2022
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions regarding the refund of an amount as per the RERA order and noted the appellant's intent to amend the legal heir details.
Tribunal Order #0901126000792019-25-01-2021
The Tribunal adjourned the case and directed the respondent to prepare and email a settlement proposal to the appellant and his counsel within 15 days.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal as 'not pressed,' allowing them to seek execution of the original RERA order for refund and interest, while requesting RERA to expedite the process due to the family's financial hardship. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal as 'not pressed,' allowing them to seek execution of the original RERA order for refund and interest, while requesting RERA to expedite the process due to the family's financial hardship.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Siddharth Nandwani
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Surendra Kumar Mishra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal as 'not pressed,' allowing them to seek execution of the original RERA order for refund and interest, while requesting RERA to expedite the process due to the family's financial hardship.
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions regarding the refund of an amount as per the RERA order and noted the appellant's intent to amend the legal heir details.
The Tribunal adjourned the case and directed the respondent to prepare and email a settlement proposal to the appellant and his counsel within 15 days.
Need to research all rulings for sahara prime city ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.