Appellant / Complainant
Ravi Pratap Singh
Respondent
Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
sikka infrastructure pvt ltd
₹31,47,620
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126016082024 by Ravi Pratap Singh against Sikka Infrastructure Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The Appellate Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the promoter is not entitled to 'zero period' or 'Covid-19' exemptions as force majeure and must refund the entire deposit of Rs. 31,47,620 with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the respondent's failure to appear and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the respondent to the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent due to illness and directed the parties to complete the exchange of pending pleadings, rescheduling the hearing to April 21, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent due to illness and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by both parties and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 24.02.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for a final hearing on 05.02.2025 and directed that pleadings be completed in the interim.
For Order
The proceedings were adjourned following an adjournment application by the respondent's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 28.01.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 07.01.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for orders on 09.12.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the matter to be listed for hearing on 05.11.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 24.09.2024 for orders/hearing due to the absence of the respondent and technical glitches with the portal.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and allowed the appellant to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for August 21, 2024.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for the service of appeal documents and the filing of objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126016082024-09-05-2025
The Appellate Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the promoter is not entitled to 'zero period' or 'Covid-19' exemptions as force majeure and must refund the entire deposit of Rs. 31,47,620 with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit.
Tribunal Order #0901126016082024-21-04-2025
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the respondent's failure to appear and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the respondent to the appellant.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the promoter is not entitled to 'zero period' or 'Covid-19' exemptions as force majeure and must refund the entire deposit of Rs. 31,47,620 with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the promoter is not entitled to 'zero period' or 'Covid-19' exemptions as force majeure and must refund the entire deposit of Rs. 31,47,620 with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1% per annum
Interest Period
from the date of deposit till the date of actual payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Appellate Tribunal modified the Regulatory Authority's order, ruling that the promoter is not entitled to 'zero period' or 'Covid-19' exemptions as force majeure and must refund the entire deposit of Rs. 31,47,620 with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit.
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the respondent's failure to appear and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the respondent to the appellant.
Need to research all rulings for sikka infrastructure pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.