Appellant / Complainant
Ats Homes Private Limited
Respondent
Prithipal Singh Sikka
ats homes private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015892024 by Ats Homes Private Limited against Prithipal Singh Sikka before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone a 713-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the provided justifications were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
Delay condonation
The court noted that the appeal is already scheduled for a hearing on July 4, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange pleadings and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the delay condonation application on 22.05.2025 before a regular Bench.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 09.05.2025 to consider an application for condonation of delay and directed the respondent to file objections in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent additional time to file an objection and scheduled the appeal for a subsequent hearing on 25.04.2025.
Delay condonation
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed on 04.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard the parties and their representatives and scheduled the appeal for further orders or hearing on March 7, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 14.02.2025 at 1:30 pm following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the filing of the affidavit of service and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the memo of appeal and the application for condonation of delay, scheduling the next hearing for 17.01.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and directed the applicant to serve the notice and application for condonation of delay via speed-post and email, scheduling the matter for hearing on 29.11.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file an amendment application and scheduled the next hearing for October 25, 2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to upload documents regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 27.09.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file documents proving that money realized from the promoter has been deposited with RERA, and scheduled the case for hearing on 13.09.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the office to submit a report within three days regarding the appellant's compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant two days to rectify filing defects and directed the Office to submit a report on the removal of such defects within three days, scheduling the next hearing for 12.07.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126015892024-04-07-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone a 713-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the provided justifications were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
Tribunal Order #0901126015892024-12-08-2024
The Tribunal directed the office to submit a report within three days regarding the appellant's compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone a 713-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the provided justifications were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone a 713-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the provided justifications were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone a 713-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the provided justifications were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
The Tribunal directed the office to submit a report within three days regarding the appellant's compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Need to research all rulings for ats homes private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.