Appellant / Complainant
Ats Homes Private Limited
Respondent
Gurleen Sikka
ats homes private limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126015802024 by Ats Homes Private Limited against Gurleen Sikka before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 707-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the reasons provided for the delay were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
Delay condonation
The court noted that the appeal is already scheduled for a hearing on July 4, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange pleadings and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 22.05.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request to list the appeal on 09.05.2025 to consider the application for condonation of delay and allowed the respondent to file objections in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent additional time to file their objection and adjourned the appeal to 25.04.2025.
Delay condonation
Upon the joint request of the learned counsel for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to be listed on 04.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for further orders or hearing on March 7, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 14.02.2025 at 1:30 pm following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the filing of the affidavit of service and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the memo of appeal and the application for condonation of delay, scheduling the next hearing for 17.01.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notices to the respondent regarding the appeal and directed the applicant to serve the notice and file an affidavit of service, scheduling the matter for consideration of the condonation of delay on 29.11.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file an amendment application and scheduled the next hearing for 25.10.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to upload documents regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 27.09.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file documents proving that money received from the promoter has been deposited with RERA, and scheduled the case for hearing on 13.09.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the office to report within three days on whether the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act has been met, following the appellant's claim of depositing Rs. 22,82,377/-.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant two days to rectify any filing defects and directed the Office to submit a report on the matter within three days, adjourning the case to 12.07.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126015802024-04-07-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 707-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the reasons provided for the delay were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
Tribunal Order #0901126015802024-12-08-2024
The Tribunal directed the office to report within three days on whether the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act has been met, following the appellant's claim of depositing Rs. 22,82,377/-.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 707-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the reasons provided for the delay were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 707-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the reasons provided for the delay were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of a 707-day delay and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the reasons provided for the delay were flimsy and lacked sufficient cause.
The Tribunal directed the office to report within three days on whether the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act has been met, following the appellant's claim of depositing Rs. 22,82,377/-.
Need to research all rulings for ats homes private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.