Appellant / Complainant
Himalaya Realestate Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Kailash Achhara
himalaya realestate pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013422023 by Himalaya Realestate Pvt. Ltd. against Kailash Achhara before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay caused by their legal representative.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 16.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 19.03.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration regarding the application for condonation of delay on 19.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Delay condonation
Upon the request of the parties, the Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for hearing on 18.02.2025 before the regular Bench.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion or handing over of possession of the respective units.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the respondent's statement that they are not pressing for the execution of any Recovery Certificate (R.C.) against the appellant and adjourned the appeal for hearing on 05.11.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 446/2023 for the relevant directions.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 20.08.2024.
For Order
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 446/2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 29.05.2024 for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.05.2024.
For Order
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 446/2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.03.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant a 10-day extension to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 15.02.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 24 hours to file objections and a Vakalatnama, while imposing a cost of Rs 1,000/- on the respondent for the delay.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for 21.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the Registry to ensure the application for condonation of delay is properly uploaded and ordered the issuance of notice to the respondent, returnable on 04.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the applicant and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 24.04.2023.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to resolve potential filing defects with the Registry regarding a missing application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for orders on 20.04.2023.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted the absence of a filed application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant's counsel to rectify the defect and contact the Registry before the next hearing on 18.04.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126013422023-21-08-2023
The Tribunal granted the respondent 24 hours to file objections and a Vakalatnama, while imposing a cost of Rs 1,000/- on the respondent for the delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126013422023-16-04-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay caused by their legal representative.
Tribunal Order #0901126013422023-02-01-2025
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion or handing over of possession of the respective units.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay caused by their legal representative. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay caused by their legal representative.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nilaya Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Awanitika
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal granted the respondent 24 hours to file objections and a Vakalatnama, while imposing a cost of Rs 1,000/- on the respondent for the delay.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay caused by their legal representative.
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's interim stay application and directed both parties to submit a chart detailing delays in the completion or handing over of possession of the respective units.
Need to research all rulings for himalaya realestate pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.