up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126013122023

Appellant / Complainant

Ar Landcraft Llp

VS

Respondent

Kapil Dev Sharma

Developer Firm

ar landcraft llp

Disputed Amount

1,22,57,733

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

18 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126013122023 by Ar Landcraft Llp against Kapil Dev Sharma before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 107/05/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders of the Adjudicating Officer in three appeals, ruling that the Adjudicating Officer exceeded its jurisdiction by granting interest as compensation and awarding rent for delayed possession.

3
Stage 226/02/2024

Hearing

The court has heard the arguments from both parties and reserved the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 323/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the learned counsel for both parties to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 26.02.2024.

5
Stage 422/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a family issue and rescheduled the matter for February 23, 2024.

6
Stage 521/02/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the matter has been adjourned and rescheduled for hearing on 22.02.2024.

7
Stage 620/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the matter, rescheduling the hearing for 21.02.2024.

8
Stage 719/02/2024

Hearing

The matter is adjourned to the following day for further hearing because the respondent's counsel was unable to attend due to city restrictions.

9
Stage 816/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment due to the personal difficulty of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 19.02.2024.

10
Stage 915/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a joint request from the counsels of both parties for an adjournment to conduct research regarding compensation under Section 18(3) of the Act, rescheduling the matter for February 16, 2024.

11
Stage 1018/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal restrained the Regulatory Authority and its agencies from recovering any amounts pursuant to the impugned order dated 19.01.2023 to prevent double jeopardy, as the appellant had already complied with Section 43(5) of the Act.

12
Stage 1122/09/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the parties to exchange documents electronically and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 07.11.2023.

13
Stage 1207/08/2023

For Order

No text available.

14
Stage 1325/05/2023

For Order

No text available.

15
Stage 1413/04/2023

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent after verifying compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the matter for hearing on 25.05.2023.

16
Stage 15Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013122023-07-05-2024

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders of the Adjudicating Officer in three appeals, ruling that the Adjudicating Officer exceeded its jurisdiction by granting interest as compensation and awarding rent for delayed possession.

17
Stage 16Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126013122023-18-01-2024

The Tribunal restrained the Regulatory Authority and its agencies from recovering any amounts pursuant to the impugned order dated 19.01.2023 to prevent double jeopardy, as the appellant had already complied with Section 43(5) of the Act.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders of the Adjudicating Officer in three appeals, ruling that the Adjudicating Officer exceeded its jurisdiction by granting interest as compensation and awarding rent for delayed possession. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders of the Adjudicating Officer in three appeals, ruling that the Adjudicating Officer exceeded its jurisdiction by granting interest as compensation and awarding rent for delayed possession.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from 01.07.2022 till the date of issuance of offer of possession along with OC/CC

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Syed Mohammad Abid
  • Rohan Malik

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Altaf Mansoor

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013122023-07-05-2024

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders of the Adjudicating Officer in three appeals, ruling that the Adjudicating Officer exceeded its jurisdiction by granting interest as compensation and awarding rent for delayed possession.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126013122023-18-01-2024

The Tribunal restrained the Regulatory Authority and its agencies from recovering any amounts pursuant to the impugned order dated 19.01.2023 to prevent double jeopardy, as the appellant had already complied with Section 43(5) of the Act.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for ar landcraft llp?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →