up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126002002023

Appellant / Complainant

Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Ashok Kumar Ahuja, Vinita Ahuja

Developer Firm

gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

25 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002002023 by Gaursons Hi-Tech Infrastructure Private Limited against Ashok Kumar Ahuja, Vinita Ahuja before up_rera.

2
Stage 108/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registrar to release the amount deposited by the appellant promoter under Section 43(5) of the Act, including any accrued interest from fixed deposits, via RTGS.

3
Stage 212/05/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for July 8, 2025.

4
Stage 318/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.05.2025.

5
Stage 420/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has listed the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing on 18.04.2025.

6
Stage 503/01/2025

Delay condonation

The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant failed to file a required affidavit in support of their delay condonation application despite being granted a final opportunity.

7
Stage 616/12/2024

Delay condonation

Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled it for orders on January 3, 2025.

8
Stage 728/11/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

9
Stage 823/10/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 28.11.2024 for hearing on the delay condonation application and issued a warning that no further adjournments will be granted to the appellant.

10
Stage 912/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a better affidavit regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, listing the matter for orders on 23.10.2024.

11
Stage 1020/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a final seven-day extension to the appellant to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, listing the matter for orders on 12.09.2024.

12
Stage 1107/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal, with the respondent directed to reply within three days.

13
Stage 1218/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for orders on 07.08.2024, noting that similar matters are scheduled for that date.

14
Stage 1322/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the defective appeal for hearing on 18.07.2024, aligning its schedule with a similar matter already listed for that date.

15
Stage 1422/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered that the defective appeal be listed for orders or hearing on 22.05.2024.

16
Stage 1515/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 22.04.2024.

17
Stage 1613/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 15.03.2024 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

18
Stage 1705/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections to the grounds of appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 500/-, and directed the applicant to file replies within ten days thereafter.

19
Stage 1828/09/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

20
Stage 1917/08/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondents 10 days to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 28.09.2023.

21
Stage 2005/06/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents regarding the applicant's application for condonation of delay and directed specific procedural steps for service of notice and filing of objections before the next hearing on 17.08.2023.

22
Stage 21Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126002002023-03-01-2025

The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant failed to file a required affidavit in support of their delay condonation application despite being granted a final opportunity.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126002002023-05-01-2024

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections to the grounds of appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 500/-, and directed the applicant to file replies within ten days thereafter.

24
Stage 23Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126002002023-08-07-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registrar to release the amount deposited by the appellant promoter under Section 43(5) of the Act, including any accrued interest from fixed deposits, via RTGS.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant failed to file a required affidavit in support of their delay condonation application despite being granted a final opportunity. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registrar to release the amount deposited by the appellant promoter under Section 43(5) of the Act, including any accrued interest from fixed deposits, via RTGS. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant failed to file a required affidavit in support of their delay condonation application despite being granted a final opportunity. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registrar to release the amount deposited by the appellant promoter under Section 43(5) of the Act, including any accrued interest from fixed deposits, via RTGS.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Samrat Vaish
  • Mohit Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Anurag Arora
  • Zaid Khan

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126002002023-03-01-2025

The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant failed to file a required affidavit in support of their delay condonation application despite being granted a final opportunity.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126002002023-05-01-2024

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections to the grounds of appeal subject to a cost of Rs. 500/-, and directed the applicant to file replies within ten days thereafter.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126002002023-08-07-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn following an out-of-court settlement and directed the Registrar to release the amount deposited by the appellant promoter under Section 43(5) of the Act, including any accrued interest from fixed deposits, via RTGS.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for gaursons hi-tech infrastructure private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →