up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000282023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Mahendra Kumar Pandey

Developer Firm

u.p. awas evam vikas parishad

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000282023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Mahendra Kumar Pandey before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 103/01/2025

For Order

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but directly awarded the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.06.2017.

3
Stage 207/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding legal precedents and subsequently reserved the judgment for further consideration.

4
Stage 318/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, following the request of counsel, adjourned the matter to be listed for orders/hearing on 07.08.2024.

5
Stage 417/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 519/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 26/2023 for further directions.

7
Stage 613/03/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for hearing/orders on 19.04.2024.

8
Stage 707/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel three days to prepare his brief and scheduled the appeal for hearing on March 13, 2024.

9
Stage 830/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to sanctioned leave and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 07.03.2024.

10
Stage 931/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

11
Stage 1026/09/2023

Hearing

The parties informed the Tribunal that the appeal is ripe for hearing, noting its readiness for substantive proceedings.

12
Stage 1110/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 26.09.2023.

13
Stage 1230/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and scheduled the next hearing for August 10, 2023.

14
Stage 1318/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal scheduled the case for orders or hearing on 30.05.2023 and directed reference to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 26/2023.

15
Stage 1402/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections and a vakalatnama, with the appeal scheduled for hearing on 18.04.2023.

16
Stage 1530/01/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, while issuing notice to the respondent for March 2, 2023.

17
Stage 16Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000282023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, while issuing notice to the respondent for March 2, 2023.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000282023-03-01-2025

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but directly awarded the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.06.2017.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but directly awarded the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.06.2017. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but directly awarded the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.06.2017.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 27.08.2015 to 06.06.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
  • Akhand Pratap Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Pramod Mitra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000282023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal, while issuing notice to the respondent for March 2, 2023.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000282023-03-01-2025

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but directly awarded the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 27.08.2015 to 06.06.2017.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for u.p. awas evam vikas parishad?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →