up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126000252023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

VS

Respondent

Deep Shikha

Developer Firm

u.p. awas evam vikas parishad

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126000252023 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Deep Shikha before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 103/01/2025

For Order

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period between 27.08.2015 and 25.07.2017.

3
Stage 207/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding the applicability of previous judgments to the current appeal and has reserved its judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 318/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal on 07.08.2024 to align with other similar matters, following an assurance from the appellant's counsel to notify the respondent.

5
Stage 417/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 519/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 26/2023 for directions regarding this matter.

7
Stage 613/03/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for hearing/orders on 19.04.2024.

8
Stage 707/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 13.03.2024 for hearing, noting that similar cases are scheduled for the same date.

9
Stage 830/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of counsel for both parties and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 7, 2024.

10
Stage 931/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

11
Stage 1026/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 31.10.2023 following a joint request from the counsels of both parties.

12
Stage 1110/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 26.09.2023.

13
Stage 1230/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 10.08.2023.

14
Stage 1318/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal scheduled the case for orders/hearing on 30.05.2023 and referred to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 27 of 2023.

15
Stage 1402/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for April 18, 2023.

16
Stage 1530/01/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. It further issued notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedures for service of notice and filing of objections.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000252023-03-01-2025

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period between 27.08.2015 and 25.07.2017.

18
Stage 17Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126000252023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. It further issued notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedures for service of notice and filing of objections.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period between 27.08.2015 and 25.07.2017. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period between 27.08.2015 and 25.07.2017.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 27.08.2015 to 25.07.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Vijay Pratap Singh Chauhan
  • Akhand Pratap Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Deepak Mishra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000252023-03-01-2025

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period between 27.08.2015 and 25.07.2017.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126000252023-30-01-2023

The Tribunal condoned a one-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal. It further issued notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedures for service of notice and filing of objections.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for u.p. awas evam vikas parishad?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →