up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126071832022

Appellant / Complainant

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Shashi Bhatnagar, Amitabh Sahai

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

18 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126071832022 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Shashi Bhatnagar, Amitabh Sahai before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 110/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 08.12.2006 to 30.04.2017 on the deposited amount.

3
Stage 227/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 10.02.2025 following a joint request from both parties for orders/hearing.

4
Stage 306/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 27.01.2025 following a joint request from both parties.

5
Stage 414/11/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five defective appeals, ruling that since the impugned orders prima facie appear to have been passed without jurisdiction, the delay should be excused to allow for a merit-based examination of the jurisdictional issues.

6
Stage 526/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application for condonation of delay and has reserved its judgment on the matter.

7
Stage 628/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant to email a copy of their rejoinder affidavit against objections to the respondent and scheduled the case for orders on September 26, 2024.

8
Stage 730/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a 7-day extension to upload a rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the appeal for hearing on August 28, 2024.

9
Stage 803/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on July 30, 2024, regarding the application for condonation of delay.

10
Stage 903/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit for the condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on July 3, 2024.

11
Stage 1002/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on May 3, 2024.

12
Stage 1128/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the respondent to file objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.

13
Stage 1218/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted 10 days for filing objections and directed the respondent's counsel to register on the portal, scheduling the next hearing for February 28, 2024.

14
Stage 1320/12/2023

Defect Removal

The Tribunal provisionally accepted a deposit of Rs. 11,85,746/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent regarding the applicant's application for condonation of a 172-day delay.

15
Stage 14Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126071832022-10-02-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 08.12.2006 to 30.04.2017 on the deposited amount.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126071832022-14-11-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five defective appeals, ruling that since the impugned orders prima facie appear to have been passed without jurisdiction, the delay should be excused to allow for a merit-based examination of the jurisdictional issues.

17
Stage 16Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126071832022-20-12-2023

The Tribunal provisionally accepted a deposit of Rs. 11,85,746/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent regarding the applicant's application for condonation of a 172-day delay.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 08.12.2006 to 30.04.2017 on the deposited amount. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 08.12.2006 to 30.04.2017 on the deposited amount.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 08.12.2006 to 30.04.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav
  • Bal Kishor Verma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Surangama Sharma
  • Amit Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126071832022-10-02-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 08.12.2006 to 30.04.2017 on the deposited amount.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126071832022-14-11-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five defective appeals, ruling that since the impugned orders prima facie appear to have been passed without jurisdiction, the delay should be excused to allow for a merit-based examination of the jurisdictional issues.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126071832022-20-12-2023

The Tribunal provisionally accepted a deposit of Rs. 11,85,746/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and issued notice to the respondent regarding the applicant's application for condonation of a 172-day delay.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →