Appellant / Complainant
Ans Developers Private Limited, Shalimar Lakecity Private Limited
Respondent
Rashmi Gupta
ans developers private limited
Appellant
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126068722022 by Ans Developers Private Limited, Shalimar Lakecity Private Limited against Rashmi Gupta before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s ANS Developers Pvt. Ltd. and set aside/quashed the order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority in favor of Rashmi Gupta.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a joint request from the counsel to list Appeal-100/2023 along with the records of Appeal No. 234 of 2019 for orders on 12.12.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the matter for orders or hearing on 11.12.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to an application for adjournment filed by the respondent's counsel on the grounds of illness and rescheduled the hearing for 12.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a rejoinder and ordered the appeal to be listed alongside Appeal No. 234/2019 on 03-10-2024 for consideration of condonation of delay and final hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 7-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 10.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 07.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and ordered that the defective appeal be listed for orders or hearing on 08.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file supplementary objections to establish their status as an allottee and scheduled the matter for hearing on May 6, 2024.
Hearing
The proceedings were adjourned due to the counsel for the applicant's medical emergency, and the defective appeal has been rescheduled for hearing on 02.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's objection to the appeal and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week, scheduling the matter for hearing on 01.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the respondent for filing objections and directed that a soft copy be provided to the applicant, with the matter listed for hearing on 27.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings of Appeal-100/2023 upon a joint request from the counsels and scheduled the defective appeal for further hearing on 31.01.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his presence at the High Court and rescheduled the hearing for 19.01.2024 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal refused the respondent's request to recall an ex-parte order dated 07.07.2023 due to undue delay and lack of diligence, directing the respondent's counsel to proceed with arguments based on existing records.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 12.10.2023.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict and rescheduled the matter for orders on 04.09.2023.
Compliance of section 43(5)
Due to the respondent's failure to file objections or a Vakalatnama despite previous extensions, the Tribunal has ordered to proceed ex parte against the respondent and listed the matter for hearing on 11.08.2023.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the applicant. The matter is scheduled for hearing on July 7, 2023.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent following the appellant's compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the matter for hearing on 27.04.2023.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant 24 hours to ensure compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 16.03.2023.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel for more time to ensure compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and adjourned the defective appeal to 03.03.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126068722022-07-07-2023
Due to the respondent's failure to file objections or a Vakalatnama despite previous extensions, the Tribunal has ordered to proceed ex parte against the respondent and listed the matter for hearing on 11.08.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126068722022-12-12-2024
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s ANS Developers Pvt. Ltd. and set aside/quashed the order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority in favor of Rashmi Gupta.
Tribunal Order #0901126068722022-16-01-2024
The Tribunal refused the respondent's request to recall an ex-parte order dated 07.07.2023 due to undue delay and lack of diligence, directing the respondent's counsel to proceed with arguments based on existing records.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s ANS Developers Pvt. Ltd. and set aside/quashed the order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority in favor of Rashmi Gupta. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s ANS Developers Pvt. Ltd. and set aside/quashed the order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority in favor of Rashmi Gupta.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anurag Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Vaibhav Krishna
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
Due to the respondent's failure to file objections or a Vakalatnama despite previous extensions, the Tribunal has ordered to proceed ex parte against the respondent and listed the matter for hearing on 11.08.2023.
The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s ANS Developers Pvt. Ltd. and set aside/quashed the order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority in favor of Rashmi Gupta.
The Tribunal refused the respondent's request to recall an ex-parte order dated 07.07.2023 due to undue delay and lack of diligence, directing the respondent's counsel to proceed with arguments based on existing records.
Need to research all rulings for ans developers private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.