Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Monica Mathur, Keshav Prasad Mathur
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126065362021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Monica Mathur, Keshav Prasad Mathur before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 14.09.2014 to 23.11.2022 (excluding a two-year period) based on admitted facts.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment because the appellant's senior counsel was unavailable and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.10.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel time to prepare the brief and adjourned the appeal to 11.09.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for final hearing on 27.08.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the respondent and scheduled the case for orders on 06.08.2025.
Delay condonation
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of any representative and no request for adjournment.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and scheduled the appeal, along with Cross Appeal No. 813 of 2021, for hearing on 20.03.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondents' objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.01.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension to the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, failing which the opportunity will be closed.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the respondents to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 10.10.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal ordered that the defective Appeal-28/2022 be listed for hearing on 19.09.2022 along with the related Appeal No. 813/2021.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file their Vakalatnama and an objection to the delay condonation application, scheduling the matter for August 24, 2022, to address the application.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal to the respondents via email and ordered the respondents to file a reply, with a subsequent timeline for the appellant's replication. The matter is scheduled for further proceedings on 13.07.2022.
Hearing
The court directed the respondent's counsel to file proof of compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the case for a hearing on 04.05.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the required amount and to file an application for condonation of delay within 15 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126065362021-09-10-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 14.09.2014 to 23.11.2022 (excluding a two-year period) based on admitted facts.
Tribunal Order #0901126065362021-28-04-2023
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of any representative and no request for adjournment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 14.09.2014 to 23.11.2022 (excluding a two-year period) based on admitted facts. The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of any representative and no request for adjournment. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 14.09.2014 to 23.11.2022 (excluding a two-year period) based on admitted facts. The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of any representative and no request for adjournment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1 percent per annum
Interest Period
w.e.f. 14.09.2014 to 23.11.2022 (excluding period of two years)
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Anju Awasthy
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anupam Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum from 14.09.2014 to 23.11.2022 (excluding a two-year period) based on admitted facts.
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of any representative and no request for adjournment.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.