Appellant / Complainant
Ramesh K Aggarwal
Respondent
Samridhi Buildmart Private Limited
samridhi buildmart private limited
₹5,00,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126065092022 by Ramesh K Aggarwal against Samridhi Buildmart Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' under the RERA Act because no formal agreement was executed after the initial booking amount was paid.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's counsel repeatedly seeking adjournments and failing to argue the matter.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.04.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to a new hearing date of March 7, 2025, following a request from the counsel for the parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for February 7, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to upload judicial decisions and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on January 22, 2025.
Hearing
The appeal was adjourned at the request of the appellant's counsel and is scheduled for a hearing on 07.01.2025.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the matter and scheduled the appeal for orders on 28.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-85/2023 and listed the matter for hearing on 23.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to prepare the brief and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on September 2, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 21.08.2024 for orders/hearing following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for hearing or orders on 24.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for April 25, 2024.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal (APPEAL-85/2023) for a hearing on November 3, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent liberty to file an application for condonation of delay regarding their objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/-, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 21.09.2023.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and scheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 17.05.2023.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed post and email, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 04.04.2023.
Tribunal Order #0901126065092022-07-05-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' under the RERA Act because no formal agreement was executed after the initial booking amount was paid.
Tribunal Order #0901126065092022-02-02-2024
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Tribunal Order #0901126065092022-18-09-2023
The Tribunal granted the respondent liberty to file an application for condonation of delay regarding their objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/-, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 21.09.2023.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' under the RERA Act because no formal agreement was executed after the initial booking amount was paid. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' under the RERA Act because no formal agreement was executed after the initial booking amount was paid. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nirmit Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Mandeep Singh
- Rohit Jaiswal
- Jayant Gupta
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant does not qualify as an 'allottee' under the RERA Act because no formal agreement was executed after the initial booking amount was paid.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
The Tribunal granted the respondent liberty to file an application for condonation of delay regarding their objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/-, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 21.09.2023.
Need to research all rulings for samridhi buildmart private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.