Appellant / Complainant
Mahendra Pratap Shahi
Respondent
Parsvnath Developers Limited
parsvnath developers limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126064612021 by Mahendra Pratap Shahi against Parsvnath Developers Limited before up_rera.
Re-Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel on the current and previous hearing dates.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 28.05.2025 due to the unavailability of the appellant and technical issues with the web portal.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and directed the Registry to verify if notice for the hearing was duly communicated, subsequently listing the matter for hearing on 16.05.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has reserved the judgment following arguments regarding whether the project was an ongoing project as of 01.05.2017 and thus required RERA registration.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to reply to the respondent's arguments and adjourned the matter to 12.09.2024 for further orders/hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from both counsels to list the appeal for hearing on 27.08.2024 following the submission of a fresh copy of the memo of appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and, upon joint request from counsel, adjourned the appeal for hearing to 25.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment by the Appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders/hearing on July 2, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the appeal from 'defective' status to a regular appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 02.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a medical exigency and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's additional time to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal library.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for hearing on July 11, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the applicant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent's counsel, adjourning the matter to 06.12.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has ordered the case to be listed for a subsequent hearing on 10.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections and directed that copies be emailed to the appellant, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 29.09.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The matter was adjourned because the counsel for the respondent was on sanctioned leave; the defective appeal is scheduled to be listed again on 10.08.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted extensions of time to both the appellant and respondent for filing replies and objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, respectively.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to illness and scheduled the next hearing for July 4, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on May 18, 2022, regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for consideration of an application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing on May 4, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and directed the immediate filing of the pending affidavit of service.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 18.04.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued fresh notices to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the notice, application for condonation of delay, and memo of appeal via speed post and email, with the matter listed for hearing on 07.04.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and directed the appellant to serve the respondent via speed post, scheduling the next hearing for 08.02.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126064612021-09-02-2024
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's additional time to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal library.
Tribunal Order #0901126064612021-28-05-2025
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel on the current and previous hearing dates.
Tribunal Order #0901126064612021-10-08-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel on the current and previous hearing dates. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel on the current and previous hearing dates.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shailender Singh
- Srajak Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Chadha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's additional time to file a reply to the respondent's objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the legal library.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel on the current and previous hearing dates.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for parsvnath developers limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.