up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126064172022

Appellant / Complainant

Ashish Sinha

VS

Respondent

G.S Promoters Pvt. Ltd

Developer Firm

g.s promoters pvt. ltd

Disputed Amount

46,32,352

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

22 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126064172022 by Ashish Sinha against G.S Promoters Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & QualityJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 122/11/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that an Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant compensation for delay when an allottee does not intend to exit the project; instead, such interest claims must be directed to the Regulatory Authority.

3
Stage 223/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer concerning interest for delay periods and has reserved its judgment.

4
Stage 324/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and scheduled it for a subsequent hearing on 23.07.2024.

5
Stage 425/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing/orders on 24.05.2024.

6
Stage 509/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for hearing or orders on 25.04.2024.

7
Stage 622/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment submitted by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.04.2022.

8
Stage 729/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 22.03.2024 to allow the parties an opportunity to reach an amicable settlement.

9
Stage 817/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a reply and scheduled the hearing for February 29, 2024, to consider the application for condonation of delay.

10
Stage 913/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

11
Stage 1005/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh for lawyers to abstain from judicial work, rescheduling the hearing for 13.10.2023.

12
Stage 1113/07/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and scheduled the next hearing for September 5, 2023.

13
Stage 1202/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to issue fresh notice to the respondent and directed the Registry to facilitate service via email and speed post, with the next hearing scheduled for 13.07.2023.

14
Stage 1321/03/2023

For Order

No text available.

15
Stage 1410/02/2023

For Order

No text available.

16
Stage 1506/01/2023

For Order

No text available.

17
Stage 1603/01/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant two days to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the appeal for hearing on January 6, 2023.

18
Stage 1722/12/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service.

19
Stage 1825/11/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal ruled that there was no delay in filing the appeal based on e-portal upload timestamps and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

20
Stage 19Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126064172022-22-11-2024

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that an Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant compensation for delay when an allottee does not intend to exit the project; instead, such interest claims must be directed to the Regulatory Authority.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126064172022-25-11-2022

The Tribunal ruled that there was no delay in filing the appeal based on e-portal upload timestamps and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that an Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant compensation for delay when an allottee does not intend to exit the project; instead, such interest claims must be directed to the Regulatory Authority. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that an Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant compensation for delay when an allottee does not intend to exit the project; instead, such interest claims must be directed to the Regulatory Authority.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

from 12.04.2016 to 30.04.2017 (compensation) and from 01.05.2017 till the date of receipt of part OC

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 14(3)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Aahuti Agarwal

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Mandeep Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126064172022-22-11-2024

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that an Adjudicating Officer lacks jurisdiction to grant compensation for delay when an allottee does not intend to exit the project; instead, such interest claims must be directed to the Regulatory Authority.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126064172022-25-11-2022

The Tribunal ruled that there was no delay in filing the appeal based on e-portal upload timestamps and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for g.s promoters pvt. ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →