Appellant / Complainant
Archana Tyagi
Respondent
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
₹20,00,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126063012022 by Archana Tyagi against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is not entitled to compensation for the differential interest component paid on a bank loan compared to the prescribed RERA interest rate.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 19-day delay in filing the appeal due to bona fide reasons and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The proceedings were adjourned following an adjournment application by the appellant's counsel, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 17.01.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 18.12.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and directed the respondent to file objections to the appellant's better affidavit within 10 days, listing the matter for hearing on 20.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit and directed them to provide a soft copy to the respondent, with the matter listed for hearing on 15.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the filing of a rejoinder affidavit and, upon the request of counsel for both parties, scheduled the appeal for hearing on 31.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for July 2, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for consideration of an application for condonation of delay and subsequent hearing on 08.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 05.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled a defective appeal for consideration regarding an application for condonation of delay on 01.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent due to their counsel being involved in an accident and rescheduled the hearing for 16.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a scheduling conflict at the High Court and rescheduled the hearing for 04.10.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file a reply to the objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on August 22, 2023, regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the filing of objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 04.07.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for April 24, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal treated service of notice on the respondent as sufficient and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections, with the next hearing scheduled for February 3, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to serve the notice via speed-post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126063012022-12-02-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is not entitled to compensation for the differential interest component paid on a bank loan compared to the prescribed RERA interest rate.
Tribunal Order #0901126063012022-17-01-2025
The Tribunal condoned a 19-day delay in filing the appeal due to bona fide reasons and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is not entitled to compensation for the differential interest component paid on a bank loan compared to the prescribed RERA interest rate. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is not entitled to compensation for the differential interest component paid on a bank loan compared to the prescribed RERA interest rate.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Sharad Tyagi
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ajai Kumar Gupta
- Rishindra Vikram Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the allottee is not entitled to compensation for the differential interest component paid on a bank loan compared to the prescribed RERA interest rate.
The Tribunal condoned a 19-day delay in filing the appeal due to bona fide reasons and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.