Appellant / Complainant
Jkg Construction Pvt Ltd
Respondent
Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Rera/Vice Chairman Gaziaabad Development Authority, Nisha Anand
jkg construction pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126061942021 by Jkg Construction Pvt Ltd against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Rera/Vice Chairman Gaziaabad Development Authority, Nisha Anand before up_rera.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear and failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act despite multiple opportunities.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a two-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, noting that failure to do so will result in an order being passed according to the provisions of the Act.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects and comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, before the next hearing scheduled for December 21, 2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126061942021-15-03-2022
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear and failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act despite multiple opportunities.
Tribunal Order #0901126061942021-21-12-2021
The Tribunal granted the appellant a two-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, noting that failure to do so will result in an order being passed according to the provisions of the Act.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear and failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act despite multiple opportunities. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear and failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act despite multiple opportunities.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Arvind Kumar Shukla
- Shobhit Singh
- Shimpy Sharma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to appear and failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act despite multiple opportunities.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a two-week extension to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act, noting that failure to do so will result in an order being passed according to the provisions of the Act.
Need to research all rulings for jkg construction pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.