Appellant / Complainant
Nidhi Sharma
Respondent
Utc Softech Private Limited
utc softech private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126061792021 by Nidhi Sharma against Utc Softech Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and no request for adjournment was received.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file a Vakalatnama and objections to the grounds of appeal, warning that failure to comply will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties during the hearing and adjourned the matter to 21.07.2022.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and ordered the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 11.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal if no defects are found and permitted the applicant to serve fresh notice to the respondent via dasti summons for the next hearing on 06.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to submit proof of the returned postal notice remark within one week to determine if fresh notices need to be issued, and scheduled the matter for 21.03.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the applicant one week to comply with the previous order dated 25.01.2022 regarding the filing of an affidavit of service and rescheduled the matter for 09.03.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the removal of filing defects and ordered that notice be issued to the respondent, with the appellant tasked with serving the notice via speed post.
Tribunal Order #0901126061792021-06-04-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and ordered the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 11.05.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126061792021-16-08-2022
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and no request for adjournment was received.
Tribunal Order #0901126061792021-21-07-2022
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file a Vakalatnama and objections to the grounds of appeal, warning that failure to comply will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and no request for adjournment was received. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and no request for adjournment was received.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nishant
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Hanuman Das
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and ordered the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing on 11.05.2022.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and no request for adjournment was received.
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file a Vakalatnama and objections to the grounds of appeal, warning that failure to comply will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte.
Need to research all rulings for utc softech private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.