up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126060892021

Appellant / Complainant

Pradeep Bansal

VS

Respondent

Eminent Planners & Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

eminent planners & developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126060892021 by Pradeep Bansal against Eminent Planners & Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 102/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate complaints regarding unregistered projects, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's direction to take action against the respondent for statutory violations.

3
Stage 221/03/2023

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 311/11/2022

Ex-Parte

The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel and reserved the judgment for a later date.

5
Stage 419/10/2022

Ex-Parte

The Tribunal noted the respondent's absence and scheduled the case for the delivery of judgment on November 11, 2022.

6
Stage 521/09/2022

Ex-Parte

The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a list of dates and relied-upon judgments and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 19.10.2022.

7
Stage 623/08/2022

Hearing

Due to the respondent's failure to appear despite being served, the Tribunal ordered the case to proceed ex-parte and scheduled it for an ex-parte hearing on 21.09.2022.

8
Stage 713/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument that publication in 'Amar Ujala' constitutes sufficient notice based on Supreme Court precedent, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 23.08.2022.

9
Stage 804/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal permitted the appellant to serve notice to the respondent via their registered e-mail ID and speed post instead of newspaper publication, and scheduled the matter for 13.07.2022.

10
Stage 925/03/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to justify the publication of notice in 'Amar Ujala' instead of the specified newspapers or take alternative steps to serve the respondent.

11
Stage 1010/01/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to publish a notice in newspapers circulating in Agra (such as Dainik Jagran, Hindustan Times, or Times of India) within 15 days and scheduled the next hearing for February 10, 2022.

12
Stage 1113/12/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for the service of appeal documents, filing of objections, and subsequent replies before the next hearing on 10.01.2022.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126060892021-02-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate complaints regarding unregistered projects, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's direction to take action against the respondent for statutory violations.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126060892021-13-07-2022

The Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument that publication in 'Amar Ujala' constitutes sufficient notice based on Supreme Court precedent, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 23.08.2022.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate complaints regarding unregistered projects, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's direction to take action against the respondent for statutory violations. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate complaints regarding unregistered projects, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's direction to take action against the respondent for statutory violations.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Fuhar Gupta
  • Prashant Kumar

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126060892021-02-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that U.P. RERA lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate complaints regarding unregistered projects, while upholding the Regulatory Authority's direction to take action against the respondent for statutory violations.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126060892021-13-07-2022

The Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument that publication in 'Amar Ujala' constitutes sufficient notice based on Supreme Court precedent, and scheduled the matter for further orders on 23.08.2022.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for eminent planners & developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →