Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Madhvendra Kumar Pandey
Partial
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126060462021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Madhvendra Kumar Pandey before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 07.08.2019.
Hearing
The Tribunal decided to proceed with an ex-parte hearing due to the respondent's repeated failure to appear and reserved its judgment following arguments from the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list this appeal alongside connected matters on 07.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to appear and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 04.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and, upon being informed by the appellant's counsel that the matter is ripe for hearing, rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 06.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to repeated failure to do so and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 16.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 14.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the appellant for filing a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for November 8, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension for filing an affidavit and Vakalatnama, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on September 25, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant, Lucknow Development Authority, 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and to submit the Vakalatnama for Sri Abhishek Khare.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution because the Lucknow Development Authority failed to nominate a new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer and failed to inform the court of any difficulties.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for February 8, 2023.
Notice
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on January 9, 2023.
Notice
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 14.12.2022 due to the absence of the respondent.
Notice
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 18.11.2022 for further orders after noting that no one appeared in court despite a Vakalatnama being filed on behalf of the respondent.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent for 21.10.2022 and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed-post and email, with instructions for subsequent filing of replies.
Exchange of pleadings
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for further orders on 24.08.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed-post and email, with the matter listed for further orders on 12.07.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, condoning a 55-day delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic extension period, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the parties to file objections and pleadings on the e-portal within specified timelines and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 25.03.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove registry defects before the next hearing and ordered that notice be issued to the respondent via registered post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126060462021-03-01-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 07.08.2019.
Tribunal Order #0901126060462021-17-03-2023
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution because the Lucknow Development Authority failed to nominate a new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer and failed to inform the court of any difficulties.
Tribunal Order #0901126060462021-25-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, condoning a 55-day delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic extension period, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126060462021-07-08-2024
The Tribunal decided to proceed with an ex-parte hearing due to the respondent's repeated failure to appear and reserved its judgment following arguments from the appellant.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 07.08.2019. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 07.08.2019.
Ruling Awarded To
Partial
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1% per annum
Interest Period
30.08.2015 to 07.08.2019
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhinav Mani Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Suyash Gupta
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order for lack of jurisdiction but directed the appellant to pay delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 30.08.2015 to 07.08.2019.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution because the Lucknow Development Authority failed to nominate a new counsel following the resignation of their previous lawyer and failed to inform the court of any difficulties.
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, condoning a 55-day delay in filing the appeal due to the COVID-19 pandemic extension period, and directed the defective appeal to be registered as a Regular Appeal.
The Tribunal decided to proceed with an ex-parte hearing due to the respondent's repeated failure to appear and reserved its judgment following arguments from the appellant.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.