up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126060452021

Appellant / Complainant

Santosh Kumar Gangay

VS

Respondent

Sahara Prime City Limited

Developer Firm

sahara prime city limited

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

35 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126060452021 by Santosh Kumar Gangay against Sahara Prime City Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 119/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation claim, restoring the complaint and directing it to be decided expeditiously based on the precedent that an allottee remains entitled to seek compensation even after receiving a refund.

3
Stage 229/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.

4
Stage 306/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted adjournment applications from both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 29.01.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.

5
Stage 418/11/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-931/2021 to 06.01.2025.

6
Stage 503/10/2024

Hearing

Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has rescheduled the hearing for Appeal-931/2021 to November 18, 2024.

7
Stage 610/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for more time to prepare arguments and rescheduled the final hearing of the appeal to 03-10-2024.

8
Stage 722/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing to 10.09.2024.

9
Stage 824/07/2024

Hearing

The court granted a request to list the case for orders or hearing on 22.08.2024.

10
Stage 927/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties due to their engagements at the High Court and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.07.2024.

11
Stage 1026/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and scheduled it for a hearing on 27.05.2024.

12
Stage 1102/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and adjourned the matter to 26.04.2024 following a request for time by the respondent's counsel to complete the record.

13
Stage 1228/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has issued a routine adjournment, ordering that the appeal be listed for hearing on 02.04.2024.

14
Stage 1319/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.02.2024 and directed that no further adjournments will be granted, noting that the matter will proceed based on available records if parties fail to appear.

15
Stage 1417/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

16
Stage 1511/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned today's proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 17.10.2023.

17
Stage 1620/07/2023

Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal adjourned the proceedings scheduled for July 20, 2023, following a request for adjournment by the appellant's counsel on health grounds.

18
Stage 1709/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

19
Stage 1817/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 09.05.2023.

20
Stage 1928/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the respondent's counsel due to personal illness and rescheduled the hearing for April 17, 2023.

21
Stage 2028/02/2023

Hearing

This text represents the header/caption of an appeal (Appeal-931/2021) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Santosh Kumar Gangay versus Sahara Prime City Limited; no substantive ruling or directive is contained in this excerpt.

22
Stage 2127/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

23
Stage 2216/12/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from both parties' counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 27.01.2023.

24
Stage 2321/11/2022

Hearing

No text available.

25
Stage 2431/10/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for November 21, 2022.

26
Stage 2522/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 31.10.2022.

27
Stage 2625/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange a list of dates and events along with relied-upon judgments and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 22.09.2022.

28
Stage 2715/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings and written submissions have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 25.08.2022.

29
Stage 2806/05/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed both parties to file concise written submissions and relied-upon judgments within 20 days and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 15.07.2022.

30
Stage 2929/03/2022

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for May 6, 2022.

31
Stage 3014/03/2022

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

32
Stage 3110/01/2022

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

33
Stage 3213/12/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural timeline for service of notice, filing of objections, and submission of pleadings before the next hearing on 10.01.2022.

34
Stage 33Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126060452021-19-02-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation claim, restoring the complaint and directing it to be decided expeditiously based on the precedent that an allottee remains entitled to seek compensation even after receiving a refund.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation claim, restoring the complaint and directing it to be decided expeditiously based on the precedent that an allottee remains entitled to seek compensation even after receiving a refund. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation claim, restoring the complaint and directing it to be decided expeditiously based on the precedent that an allottee remains entitled to seek compensation even after receiving a refund.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra
  • Krishna Kumar Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Surendra Kumar Mishra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126060452021-19-02-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order that had rejected a compensation claim, restoring the complaint and directing it to be decided expeditiously based on the precedent that an allottee remains entitled to seek compensation even after receiving a refund.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for sahara prime city limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →